I was responding directly to your post that I quoted. You said Hawk shouldn't have a long-term contract. I pointed out that he does (four years left at least). And in the context of the thread, which was about long term vs. year to year contracts, if you think he shouldn't have a long-term contract he should only have a year-to-year. In any event since you said point blank that Hawk should go if he doesn't win this year, I'm at a loss as to how you think I misrepresented what you said.
We are not firing Hawk this year, or next year, or even the year after that. The University is dead broke, and the Ath. dept. owes the University money.
And no, the fans are not losing patience, because most fans know that Barnett left behind a complete mess that you can't clean up over night. Hawk has drastically improved the talent level at CU, but most of the best players are still underclassmen. You really think we should fire Hawk before Scott, Miller, Simas, Givens, Smith, Major, Evans, Deehan, Nuckols, etc. are seniors? and do you really think we can go out and get a better coach for the lowest salary in the big 12 if we run Hawk after only four or five years? Keep spending those E-tickets in Fantasyland, dude.