PurifydatA$$
Member
Anyone watch the Georgia Tech/Clemson game last night?
I caught the highlights and something about Georgia Tech's offense seemed appealing to me...
Why don't we run the triple option with Hansen, Scott and Speedy? I know it's not Talkins' style of O, but considering our strengths & weaknesses, it would probably be best suited for what we've got. It will take advantage of our strength at RB and allow our young WRs to get acclimated to D1 Big XII game speed without so much pressure on them. Plus, it takes the ball out of Cody's hands, who I'm sure everyone would agree is a good thing. If Hansen's primary responsibility is to roll out and pitch to Scott and/or Speedy with the occasional deep pass to keep defenses honest, I think we put ourselves in a much better position to win than having Cody (all due respect to him, I really do respect his leadership but not his game) throw the ball 40 times!
What do you guys (and ladies) think? Would we be successful with the triple option?
I caught the highlights and something about Georgia Tech's offense seemed appealing to me...
Why don't we run the triple option with Hansen, Scott and Speedy? I know it's not Talkins' style of O, but considering our strengths & weaknesses, it would probably be best suited for what we've got. It will take advantage of our strength at RB and allow our young WRs to get acclimated to D1 Big XII game speed without so much pressure on them. Plus, it takes the ball out of Cody's hands, who I'm sure everyone would agree is a good thing. If Hansen's primary responsibility is to roll out and pitch to Scott and/or Speedy with the occasional deep pass to keep defenses honest, I think we put ourselves in a much better position to win than having Cody (all due respect to him, I really do respect his leadership but not his game) throw the ball 40 times!
What do you guys (and ladies) think? Would we be successful with the triple option?