What's new
  • Prime Time. Prime Time. It's a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars, and best of all, no ads! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
  • After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936

'18 JC RB Rakeem Boyd (Verbal to Arkansas)

We still need Boyd
It'd be nice, but I think his credits are a hindrance. McMillan can have 60% of the carries this year. Sooner or later you'd hope for a back to step up in the group coming up/coming in. Phil kept us from having to worry about RB for 2 full years. I think they got some guys that can run the rock. You really only need 4-5 scholarship RBs. Kind of like QB. Only need one per class.
 
We still need Boyd
No. Boyd/McMillian was an either/or situation. If we brought in Boyd, that would mean losing McMillian. They're both looking for an opportunity to be a feature back.

As I think I made clear, I'm a big fan of Boyd's game. But there's academic risk there that there isn't with McMillian since Boyd still has work to do to get qualified. McMillian has also proven that he can deliver a 1,000 yard season at the P5 level and he's a career 4.8 y/a average. It's just a much safer way to go for the Buffs.
 
No. Boyd/McMillian was an either/or situation. If we brought in Boyd, that would mean losing McMillian. They're both looking for an opportunity to be a feature back.

As I think I made clear, I'm a big fan of Boyd's game. But there's academic risk there that there isn't with McMillian since Boyd still has work to do to get qualified. McMillian has also proven that he can deliver a 1,000 yard season at the P5 level and he's a career 4.8 y/a average. It's just a much safer way to go for the Buffs.

McMilllian is one and done. We would have Boyd for three years. Could Boyd wait a year before he is feature back?
 
McMilllian is one and done. We would have Boyd for three years. Could Boyd wait a year before he is feature back?
It's not Boyd I'm concerned about as a sophomore, 3 to play 3, guy. I think he'd be much more willing to do more of a split carries, RB by committee thing for a year with his eyes toward being the feature back for a year or two after that.

It's McMillian. I know if I was a grad transfer I wouldn't go into a situation unless I was guaranteed that I was being brought in to start and the job was mine unless I ****ed it up. He was VA Tech's leading rusher last year and he's leaving because he's got 1 shot to make his case for the NFL and it wasn't gonna happen in the committee situation he is leaving. I think you lose him to another opportunity if you decide to bring in Boyd.
 
P.S. Just so I'm clear, I would LOVE to have Boyd on the CU roster. Probably my favorite HS recruit at RB in the MacIntyre era and we lost out on him. He showed what he can do at Independence CC last year and I think he'd be a damn good player at CU. If there's a way to make that happen without chasing McMillian away, sign me up with zero hesitation.
 
Back
Top