Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2019 Pac-12 Tourney

aghcsm said:
There should be a metric that includes performance against a better team, although the nuances of ‘final score’ are challenging. I like the effort to incentivize good competition vs padding the win column with guarantees. Will let you know when I figure out a better way. It is true that SC has no say over their conference schedule, and if their conference happens to be very good, they benefit without having taken any positive action.
Click to expand...

That might be in the black box of the team value index, or whatever it's called; it might not, it's essentially proprietary/secret.

Net efficiency is basically scoring margin scaled to pace of play, it's computed by taking turnovers, rebounds, and shooting percentages to extrapolate points per possession.

The scoring margin directly used in the NET caps results at 10 points and considers OT games to be a 1 point margin no matter the final score.

The relative weights of the components of NET are unknown.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top