So…some sacks and TFLs?I think that our Edge group will generate more Sacks & TFLs than the 2025 group.
So…some sacks and TFLs?I think that our Edge group will generate more Sacks & TFLs than the 2025 group.
Oh they hurt….Victor Rogers was a tackle. Marwan Hage was the other guard.
Don't forget how good Wayne Lucier was at Center. Having Drumm at FB certainly didn't hurt either
Seriously. I think Arden led the group with 2.5 sacks last year. Major area for team improvement.So…some sacks and TFLs?
Is Ronald Coleman available still? I hear he is slippery
Enjoy this gem, Colorado State was feeling themselves and Lubick actually said that the pressure was on them to win because they had won 2 in a row. Then we ran over them.Victor Rogers was a tackle. Marwan Hage was the other guard.
Don't forget how good Wayne Lucier was at Center. Having Drumm at FB certainly didn't hurt either
Enjoy this gem, Colorado State was feeling themselves and Lubick actually said that the pressure was on them to win because they had won 2 in a row. Then we ran over them.
During the broadcast, they said that 99.3% of the offensive production in 2000 was back for the 2001 season. We returned 5% of the total players this year.
RB recruit.
They ran behind Gurode and Victor Rogers every play with two excellent RBs in Purify and Brown then would casually pass up the seam to Graham (best TE in nation) or pass it to McCoy if things weren’t working. It was rudimentary but no one could stop it because the Guards were DOMINANT.
Enjoy this gem, Colorado State was feeling themselves and Lubick actually said that the pressure was on them to win because they had won 2 in a row. Then we ran over them.
During the broadcast, they said that 99.3% of the offensive production in 2000 was back for the 2001 season. We returned 5% of the total players this year.
"CU - the all-time gold standard for punching itself in the dick"3. Near the end of the game, Jeremy Flores kicked a field goal and the commentators mentioned how he was out the prior week for the Fresno State game. CU lost to Fresno State by two points on a missed FG because our kicker (Flores) was not allowed to play while an English professor took his/her sweet time grading a Shakespeare paper. Because that paper was not graded the field goal was missed by the backup and later cost CU a shot at the BCS national championship. The professor probably lost the school a million dollars in 2001 money.
I'm skeptical of the real value of those degrees.I surmise that a lot of guys are still getting degrees at a similar rate, just from their final stop or somewhere close to home.
You mean that seeing on an applicant's resume that he attended 4 colleges to get a BA might be a bit of a red flag for you? No way!I'm skeptical of the real value of those degrees.
Otoh, I'm somewhat skeptical of the value of a lot of degrees from a lot of schools.
But, to compete the thought: part of what a degree earned shows is that a someone can stick with something, and put up with a lot of tedious crap for 4 or 5 years - not necessarily the content of the coursework.
Someone who has earned a degree while playing ball for 3-4 schools over 4-5 years also has shown some positive skills. Those skills are very different.
It depends on the role I'm hiring for I guess. Sometimes I need a 1-2 year mercenary to parachute in, other times I need a keep your head down and grind in one place for half a decade person.
Maybe.You mean that seeing on an applicant's resume that he attended 4 colleges to get a BA might be a bit of a red flag for you? No way!
If someone is able to get a degree while hopping from one place to another due to unrelated work changes with the major ongoing distraction and priority of being a professional athlete, that should indicate someone is capable of carrying through on a greater plan in the midst of daily chaos, academics notwithstanding.Maybe.
I might need someone that can work in different places, for different managers, and still get the job done.
You don't need a lot of people like that, but they have their niche.
It "could" indicate that, not "should". More likely, it means someone who was not academically inclined, doesn't persevere when faced with challenges, and will start shopping for a new job before they've completed orientation.If someone is able to get a degree while hopping from one place to another due to unrelated work changes with the major ongoing distraction and priority of being a professional athlete, that should indicate someone is capable of carrying through on a greater plan in the midst of daily chaos, academics notwithstanding.
Here's the thing: that would be comically easy to suss out in an interview.It "could" indicate that, not "should". More likely, it means someone who was not academically inclined, doesn't persevere when faced with challenges, and will start shopping for a new job before they've completed orientation.
Most interviewers aren’t asking deep questions about the person’s life history. “Oh, you transferred from Dayton to Bowling Green and then got your degree from Colorado? That’s cool” is what a lot of millennial and younger recruiter/hiring managers would likely say…Here's the thing: that would be comically easy to suss out in an interview.
Often interviews don't do much to separate candidates.
In this case you might have to do a lot of interviews because, as you note, there'd be a huge number of **** no, but it'd be so absurdly obvious when you hit one of the ones that's a yes that there really wouldn't be a decision.
Yeah, but you don't have to ask brilliant or hard questions to figure out if a guy did the minimum to get a degree and bounced to a bigger paycheck whenever it was offered vs one that maximized his opportunities at each stop while building a bank account balance that his family never dreamed of.Most interviewers aren’t asking deep questions about the person’s life history. “Oh, you transferred from Dayton to Bowling Green and then got your degree from Colorado? That’s cool” is what a lot of millennial and younger recruiter/hiring managers would likely say…
I guess. I think values have shifted. No millennial or younger person I work with thinks that having a job for a long time is valuable. Moving for better is a signal that they are ambitious.Yeah, but you don't have to ask brilliant or hard questions to figure out if a guy did the minimum to get a degree and bounced to a bigger paycheck whenever it was offered vs one that maximized his opportunities at each stop while building a bank account balance that his family never dreamed of.
Not gonna be a lot of the second guy out there, but you're gonna see it in about two minutes regardless of your own interview skill.
As always, yes but.I guess. I think values have shifted. No millennial or younger person I work with thinks that having a job for a long time is valuable. Moving for better is a signal that they are ambitious.
You are Gen X.As always, yes but.
In many roles it takes 6-12 months before the new hire is a net plus vs a net negative due to learning / training costs. I ain't hiring anyone for any of those roles if they've never stayed anywhere, including a school, for longer than 9 months.
I'll take a 2-3 year early career stint (hell, in my line of work if you don't move after your first 2-3 years there's something wrong with you), but there are limited roles where a 6-12 month is acceptable.
Honest question, do people actually put the schools they transferred from on a resume these days? If so, why? I would expect to see only the schools a person graduated from. I haven't given or seen a resume since the 90s so forgive my ignorance.As always, yes but.
In many roles it takes 6-12 months before the new hire is a net plus vs a net negative due to learning / training costs. I ain't hiring anyone for any of those roles if they've never stayed anywhere, including a school, for longer than 9 months.
I'll take a 2-3 year early career stint (hell, in my line of work if you don't move after your first 2-3 years there's something wrong with you), but there are limited roles where a 6-12 month is acceptable.
You don't actually know if someone bounced around in an interview. If TA or HR did a background check, it will verify the diploma and university, not the 5 schools the JAG attended. I was traveling around the world working in my early 20's, attending Florida State and Oklahoma branches, then converted those credits to CU when I went back to Colorado and finished my BSEE degree on campus. Then attended Maryland for my Masters when I lived in D.C. for three years. Nobody has ever asked me about FSU or Oklahoma, no interviewer even knows I attended those schools - they just see CU and Maryland degrees. Same goes for the 100+ employees I have hired over the past 25 years, I see the degree from the university they graduated from. If these players don't offer up the fact they attended 14 colleges in a money grab, the employer never knows.Most interviewers aren’t asking deep questions about the person’s life history. “Oh, you transferred from Dayton to Bowling Green and then got your degree from Colorado? That’s cool” is what a lot of millennial and younger recruiter/hiring managers would likely say…
Unless the employer, as part of their really in depth background check, plugs their name into a search database like, I dunno, Google.If these players don't offer up the fact they attended 14 colleges in a money grab, the employer never knows.
And to bring it back to football, once everyone jumps annually into the portal, college football will be worse.