What's new
  • Prime Time. Prime Time. It's a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars, and best of all, no ads! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
  • After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936

College Football Realignment

Kliavkoff spoke to 100 people on the rowing and equestrian teams.

in fairness to Kliavkoff, the participants in the non revenue sports are pretty unhappy, some even pissed. But, in the end, they don’t exist without football money, so their upsetness really doesn’t matter.
Klatt used to joke about how he would see a non revenue sport athlete around Dal Ward and when they would say “hi”, he would just say, “you’re welcome”.
 
So $32 million per school per year. Is there more money from other rights? I was told they were talking $40 million per school.
 
Tier 3 not included. I'm thinking Tier probably gets them there.
No way some of those schools sniff $8 mil /year for tier 3. KU might with Bball, but tier 3 is entirely driven by local market and viewership and none of the schools outside Texas are large market.
 

Its Time To Go Goodbye GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
Big 12 appear to be paying more than the PAC will get.

PAC has no stability considering UW UO are constantly flight risks.

Given the above, CU should go to the Big 12. I’d be colluding with the other four corner schools right now.
IIRC, the new B12 deal looks to be nearly identical to the predicted deal by the sports media analytics company posted earlier ITT.
 
It’s actually a really funny joke. I wasn’t there to witness whether it ever actually happened
You guys need to lighten up, my goodness

Klatt admitted as much on his radio show with CJ back in the day, he made it quite clear it wasn't a joke. He was also super pissed about the new hoops practice facility being built and mocked it live on air. So no, we don't need to lighen up.
 
Yes, 31.7 is more than previously reported ESPN/P12 negotiations.

agree on t3.
Yes, live rights keep going up. I’m confused at to what you’re trying to say. Pac 12 could easily get that but tv partners want the league to stay intact. No schools want to put that in writing
 
Yes, live rights keep going up. I’m confused at to what you’re trying to say. Pac 12 could easily get that but tv partners want the league to stay intact. No schools want to put that in writing
Marchand reported P12 is 100s of millions apart with ESPN. The first number floated was 22. Then 25. I think the p12 number remains less than a comparable b12 number at the moment. GK needs a solid streaming deal. All JMO.
 
Kliavkoff spoke to 100 people on the rowing and equestrian teams.

in fairness to Kliavkoff, the participants in the non revenue sports are pretty unhappy, some even pissed. But, in the end, they don’t exist without football money, so their upsetness really doesn’t matter.
I look forward to USC and or UCLA having the same rival-less meh experience we did in a conference that they have no rivalries in. I take some enjoyment in the fact that ‘****s given’ will slowly dimish in a bland malaise as they cant compete and realize they were brought along mostly for their already indifferent TV market.
 
I look forward to USC and or UCLA having the same rival-less meh experience we did in a conference that they have no rivalries in. I take some enjoyment in the fact that ‘****s given’ will slowly dimish in a bland malaise as they cant compete and realize they were brought along mostly for their already indifferent TV market.
USC will challenge tOSU for the cream of the conference most years, and they will be excited to play big programs like tOSU, UM, MSU, PSU, Wis, Iowa and yes, even Nebraska. However, those games might be 3/9 conference games, while the other 6 will be highly unattractive matchups against Minn, IL, Indiana, Purdue, Maryland, or Rutgers.

UCLA is the program that is likely to regret the move outside of no longer being cash strapped
 
  • Like
Reactions: DBT
Back
Top