I really think it's about Carolina. FSU and Clemson are not needle movers for the P2.Just to play devils advocate, I think sources from the B1G and SEC are just playing legalese. The article said they aren't interested in FSU "if the ACC survives."
I really think it's about Carolina. FSU and Clemson are not needle movers for the P2.Just to play devils advocate, I think sources from the B1G and SEC are just playing legalese. The article said they aren't interested in FSU "if the ACC survives."
I really think it's about Carolina. FSU and Clemson are not needle movers for the P2.
I really think it's about Carolina. FSU and Clemson are not needle movers for the P2.
Is checker a more complicated game than checkers? Cuz it sounds kinda simple.
“When you get your little deal worked out with the B12, give us a call before you sign final papers.” G. SankeyI take the report about the B1G & SEC not having interest in FSU/Clemson or in expansion with a HUGE grain of salt. They and their media partners have a history of denials about this sort of thing until the ink is dry. They don't want any legal basis for a claim they tampered and caused a conference to implode. They don't want anyone left behind and suffering material loss to be able to sue.
The same B1G and SEC that effectively killed off two conferences by poaching Texas/OU and USC/UCLA in complete and total secrecy?? GMAB, neither conference gives a **** about optics. If either thought Clemson or FSU brought more money to their conferences, they’d be right in the middle of it.I take the report about the B1G & SEC not having interest in FSU/Clemson or in expansion with a HUGE grain of salt. They and their media partners have a history of denials about this sort of thing until the ink is dry. They don't want any legal basis for a claim they tampered and caused a conference to implode. They don't want anyone left behind and suffering material loss to be able to sue.
I guess we have our new Pac 12Consolidation makes sense so they can dump the riff raff programs like Syracuse, Wake, BC, etc.
FSU and Clemson going to be pissed that UNC and Miami go to the B1G.
If TBS can make the Big12 equal or close to the others, and Florida State and Clemson can feel like the beasts in the East, then game on.This is all happening because TBS/TNT lost their NBA contract and now has the money to spend on college athletics.
They wouldn't at this point, not publicly. The B1G continually said they weren't interested in UO/ UW... until suddenly they were. All the quotes from the SEC/ B1G are not interested "if the ACC survives." They're just speaking legalese/ coach speak to avoid tortious interference. With the exception of the Big XII last round, conferences never broadcast their interest beforehand.The same B1G and SEC that effectively killed off two conferences by poaching Texas/OU and USC/UCLA in complete and total secrecy?? GMAB, neither conference gives a **** about optics. If either thought Clemson or FSU brought more money to their conferences, they’d be right in the middle of it.
Counter to this hypothesis is that those schools are on the record as making the first move to leave the ACC. That would seemingly avoid the legal liability from the P2 being accused of tampering.I take the report about the B1G & SEC not having interest in FSU/Clemson or in expansion with a HUGE grain of salt. They and their media partners have a history of denials about this sort of thing until the ink is dry. They don't want any legal basis for a claim they tampered and caused a conference to implode. They don't want anyone left behind and suffering material loss to be able to sue.
They waited until the B12 moved by taking the 4 corner schools. This time they’ll wait until the B12 makes the first move with FSU/Clemson.They wouldn't at this point, not publicly. The B1G continually said they weren't interested in UO/ UW... until suddenly they were. All the quotes from the SEC/ B1G are not interested "if the ACC survives." They're just speaking legalese/ coach speak to avoid tortious interference. With the exception of the Big XII last round, conferences never broadcast their interest beforehand.
*That said, I'd love to be wrong. I'll be pleasantly shocked if FSU and Clemson ever end up in the Big XII.
So FSU and Clemson bring more money to the B12, but not to the SEC and B1G? How does that work?The same B1G and SEC that effectively killed off two conferences by poaching Texas/OU and USC/UCLA in complete and total secrecy?? GMAB, neither conference gives a **** about optics. If either thought Clemson or FSU brought more money to their conferences, they’d be right in the middle of it.
NahJust saying this again.
Going to end up with a 64 team league. We will have 8, 8 team divisions. Divisions will largely be based on geography. We will basically be right back to where we were in 2011 before everything went haywire.
Playoffs will basically be 16 teams, with winner of your division title game going to an 8 team playoff.
Get ready for the return of the Big 8.
This is the direction we appear to be heading. Might need three conferences of 20-24 to get there, first.Just saying this again.
Going to end up with a 64 team league. We will have 8, 8 team divisions. Divisions will largely be based on geography. We will basically be right back to where we were in 2011 before everything went haywire.
Playoffs will basically be 16 teams, with winner of your division title game going to an 8 team playoff.
Get ready for the return of the Big 8.
Because the the B1G and SEC make $75m/school/year and the Big 12 makes $31m/school/year.So FSU and Clemson bring more money to the B12, but not to the SEC and B1G? How does that work?
uncertain if this will be significant or not
I'll let Allbuffs general counsel weigh in, but I don't think anti-trust applies to ESPN when they clearly have significant competition like Fox, CBS, etc.. (and appear to be losing ground to the competition).Should be significant because ESPN & the ACC wouldn't want that stuff to be revealed in a court of law so hence the settlement talks which leads us to today's rumors of FSU & Clemson to the Big 12. If that ESPN stuff gets out in the blue like that, that might be enough for the Feds to launch an anti-trust investigation of ESPN.
I'll let Allbuffs general counsel weigh in, but I don't think anti-trust applies to ESPN when they clearly have significant competition like Fox, CBS, etc.. (and appear to be losing ground to the competition).