What's new
  • Prime Time. Prime Time. It's a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars, and best of all, no ads! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
  • After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936

If CU finishes 6-6, should CU decline bowl invitation?

Should CU say no to free exposure on national TV and in key recruiting areas?


  • Total voters
    125

Bison

Retired poster. Have a good life!
I just don't see a good reason to go to a bowl game with a 3-6 conference record. I'd rather eat a box of Chez Crackers and then suffer pain on the toilet seat than to watch CU in a bowl game after going 3-6 in conference play. I would be okay with a 4-5 record but I prefer 5-4 or better in conference play if CU is to go bowling.
 
good reasons to accept the invite in this hypothetical:
1. extra 15 practices that typically focus on developing players for next year
2. extra income from the bowl (for the Pac)
3. extra exposure from being in a Bowl (which leads to recruiting exposure)
4. increased merchandise sales
5. enhancement to the CU brand
6. reward for the players this year

when Lou Holtz at Notre Dame declined a bowl invite, it was a PR move. But Notre Dame already had the exposure and branding and didn't need the money. the situation is totally different at CU today.
 
Last edited:
mrlnu.jpg
 
good reasons to accept the invite in this hypothetical:
1. extra 15 practices that typically focus on developing players for next year
2. extra income form the bowl (for the Pac)
3. extra exposure from being in a Bowl (which leads to recruiting exposure)
4. increased merchandise sales
5. enhancement to the CU brand
6. reward for the players this year

when Lou Holtz at Notre Dame declined a bowl invite, it was a PR move. But Notre Dame already had the exposure and branding and didn't need the money. the situation is totally different at CU today.

And you left of a chance for a bunch of fans who have suffered with terrible football for well over a decade with only one bowl to show for it to go have a good time as a reward for sticking with the program.
 
And you left of a chance for a bunch of fans who have suffered with terrible football for well over a decade with only one bowl to show for it to go have a good time as a reward for sticking with the program.
Honestly, I don't view that as a good reason.

As a fan, I've attended exactly one bowl game, and somewhat regret it (VT beat UTenn in the Chik-fil-A bowl on NYE). Bowls are nothing more than glorified exhibition games with over-priced tickets. I could've gone to what turned out to be an epic Widespread Panic show across the street, instead of watching a meaningless game.

I'd feel differently if we were talking about the Rose Bowl or one of the CFP bowls.
 
Back
Top