Graduation rates are critical to our university's funding. There's a reason it's a priority. We have to increase persistence of enrollment to compensate for the lack of state funding for higher education.
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. It's a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars, and best of all, no ads! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
-
After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936
Mark Kennedy new, but soon to be old CU President - Official CU president Thread
- Thread starter buff4bcs1985
- Start date
Graduation rates are critical to our university's funding. There's a reason it's a priority. We have to increase persistence of enrollment to compensate for the lack of state funding for higher education.
Maybe New York Times will publish an article about the Regents and Their hiring process?
Obviously attend the forums if you can, but also provide your feedback on Kennedy here:
https://www.cu.edu/presidential-search/forms/cu-presidential-search-feedback
https://www.cu.edu/presidential-search/forms/cu-presidential-search-feedback
Daily Camera article from Kennedy's appearances today. He is just bad. Like not remotely equipped for this job bad.
http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-news/ci_32590383/diversity-mark-kennedy-open-forum-university-colorado
Unprepared, poorly spoken, uninspiring. Wtf is this.
Sounds like the final vote won't be remotely unanimous, as the GOP controlled BoR plows ahead, just like the rest of the modern GOP
http://www.dailycamera.com/cu-news/ci_32590383/diversity-mark-kennedy-open-forum-university-colorado
Unprepared, poorly spoken, uninspiring. Wtf is this.
Sounds like the final vote won't be remotely unanimous, as the GOP controlled BoR plows ahead, just like the rest of the modern GOP
What kind of a fool puts a Republican in charge of education?
Disappointed, embarrassed, pissed.
Surprised? Not in the least.
Surprised? Not in the least.
The Denver Post article earlier quotes a guy who proposed a tweak to the current system.
Obviously we would need to change the state constitution to get rid of the Regents.... Which seems like a long shot.
This guy proposed to Hick that they add 8 appointed seats, which would be filled by a non-partisan panel of experts. This wouldn't require a change to the Constitution.
This means that the elected BoR could still override a vote 9-8 if needed to ''enforce the will of the people' we would at least have people on the BoR with a variety of relevant expertise who are there to work for the institution, not constituents who might actively hate the school.
Hick shot it down
I’d probably shoot that down, too. A governing board of 17 members is cumbersome.
I don’t have an answer, but I know what we currently have isn’t working. Politics shouldn’t enter this process, IMO. It seems that politics has been the overriding concern from the get-go. The more I read about Kennedy, the more I’m astonished he is the “sole finalist”. We have to set our sights higher. I’m a little concerned, though, that we may be in a spot where we are unable to attract anybody better. That gets us back to the BoR dysfunction and how it impacts the ability to conduct University business. What a mess.
It does make me wonder what their hiring criteria was. All of the things we all seem to think are important (alumni relations, fundraising, staff retention, student engagement, etc) all seem to be afterthoughts to him. By extension, they appear to have been afterthoughts of the BoR as well. So what were they thinking?
Like you said, how is this guy the sole finalist?
Denver_sc
Well-Known Member
Sorry for being unclear- I do not believe it should be a fundamental pillar of the strategy for CU. I think that it should be a tactical goal. I believe that if there is more focus on being a leader in the scholarly community in other ways that the graduation rate will follow.
This is all notwithstanding the body of research that shows that performance-based funding does not necessarily improve graduation rates.
A serious question since you seem to have some background and I'd be interested to know- do you know the mechanism by which funding is influenced by graduation rate at CU?
TBH, much of the state carries a particular disdain for the the CU system. That’s at least historically been the case.
Hesitant to put my name on the CU presidential feedback being an alumnus (my father and sister are as well as my younger sister currently attending) and season ticket holder. I doubt anything would come of it, but I wasn't exactly nice in my review of his qualifications.
They should just find somebody else, this isn't gonna end well, if they hire him. Then again, that probably makes too much sense or they just don't give a rat's ass.
WarBuff
Club Member
You can always use someone else’s name!
The name part is optional, I just submitted anonymously.
OsideBuff
Dimwitted ****
Deja Vu...lol. Any Republican with conservative views would get skewered by the partisans at CU. It was about 11 years ago that Benson faced the same scrutiny...He was chastised by the CU faculty and others because of his lack of academic pedigree..had only served on academic boards. For his views on Climate change, his participation in politics as a Republican (Ran for Governor), and for his engagement in the oil and gas industry. Despite the sky falling detractors and haters, Benson has been the longest sitting president in the past 65 years, has bolstered research funding, rejected salary increases. Bottom line is that the rubber meets the road with $$$$....Benson was very good at that and I imagine Kennedy brings that same pedigree.
Benson is not even close to an equivalent. While I agree that Benson was subjected to SOME protest for his political views, that was much more of a significant minority. Others had reservations, but ultimately the regents were clear that they wanted a fundraiser, and Benson brought that in spades. He also brought the appropriate ties to the University and the State to be effective at his job despite the misgivings about his political leanings. Benson also was able to communicate his vision and connect more effectively with people. He has been a very decent President for the University, much better than the previous GOP installed Presidents of Hank Brown and Betsy Hoffman.
Kennedy lacks almost all those things, including a true fundraising pedigree, and brings a ****-ton more baggage to the table. I mean, since it was announced, he has essentially bungled every single public statement and interview that he has been given.
Kennedy lacks almost all those things, including a true fundraising pedigree, and brings a ****-ton more baggage to the table. I mean, since it was announced, he has essentially bungled every single public statement and interview that he has been given.
OsideBuff
Dimwitted ****
Bungled is in the eye of the beholder....and here is exaclty what did happen when Benson was selected...lol.
Bruce Benson becomes the uncontested, sole candidate for president of the University of Colorado. (Sound familiar?_)
Major protests are launched to resist Benson’s candidacy for president. (Sound familiar?>)
Bruce Benson makes a public statement asserting that he does not believe that human beings have had an effect on the climate change known as “global warming,” placing himself, as the only candidate for president of the state’s flagship university, as a lone rebel against the academic field of the climate science accepted by 144 countries, 9,200 scientific publications, and 55,000 comments in the critical review of 1,089 scientists from 52 nations who agree that there is room for virtually zero statistical doubt that global warming and its role in catastrophic climate change are man-made problems. (Sky is falling...lol)
Bruce Benson’s brazen stance against climate science, especially as the CEO of his own fossil fuels corporation, fosters more outrage, which is voiced in large numbers from the public and CU community against Benson’s unchallenged candidacy for CU president.
The Boulder Faculty Assembly votes against Bruce Benson’s candidacy by a margin of about 10-to-1. (Sound familiar?)
Its all partisan nonsense. Believe in what I do, or I will destroy or attempt to destroy.
OsideBuff
Dimwitted ****
Diversity of experience and contacts. Was very active in the corporate world.....very active in politics.....much experience in academia. Its all about contacts...and his resume is long and diverse.
OsideBuff
Dimwitted ****
That is your opinion and you are certainly entitled to it. I dont share it. And to attack me as a blind partisan loyalist is funny. Very funny. There is an institutional effort to derail his nomination much like with Benson. Fortunately, the one with Benson failed and I imagine this one will as well.
His contacts are mostly confined to the upper midwest. His academic contacts are not really relevant to CU, a public research-driven university. Plus North Dakota seems to be begging for him to leave.
If you compare the resumes side by side, Benson had the much better resume to be president of CU.
jizzrag85
Well-Known Member
I did it anonymously!