Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

If CU finishes 6-6, should CU decline bowl invitation?

Should CU say no to free exposure on national TV and in key recruiting areas?

  • Total voters
    125
PAC MAN

PAC MAN

Buffalo to the core.
Club Member
I just don't see a good reason to go to a bowl game with a 3-6 conference record. I'd rather eat a box of Chez Crackers and then suffer pain on the toilet seat than to watch CU in a bowl game after going 3-6 in conference play. I would be okay with a 4-5 record but I prefer 5-4 or better in conference play if CU is to go bowling.
 
good reasons to accept the invite in this hypothetical:
1. extra 15 practices that typically focus on developing players for next year
2. extra income from the bowl (for the Pac)
3. extra exposure from being in a Bowl (which leads to recruiting exposure)
4. increased merchandise sales
5. enhancement to the CU brand
6. reward for the players this year

when Lou Holtz at Notre Dame declined a bowl invite, it was a PR move. But Notre Dame already had the exposure and branding and didn't need the money. the situation is totally different at CU today.
 
Last edited:
mrlnu.jpg
 
hokiehead said:
good reasons to accept the invite in this hypothetical:
1. extra 15 practices that typically focus on developing players for next year
2. extra income form the bowl (for the Pac)
3. extra exposure from being in a Bowl (which leads to recruiting exposure)
4. increased merchandise sales
5. enhancement to the CU brand
6. reward for the players this year

when Lou Holtz at Notre Dame declined a bowl invite, it was a PR move. But Notre Dame already had the exposure and branding and didn't need the money. the situation is totally different at CU today.
Click to expand...

And you left of a chance for a bunch of fans who have suffered with terrible football for well over a decade with only one bowl to show for it to go have a good time as a reward for sticking with the program.
 
MtnBuff said:
And you left of a chance for a bunch of fans who have suffered with terrible football for well over a decade with only one bowl to show for it to go have a good time as a reward for sticking with the program.
Click to expand...
Honestly, I don't view that as a good reason.

As a fan, I've attended exactly one bowl game, and somewhat regret it (VT beat UTenn in the Chik-fil-A bowl on NYE). Bowls are nothing more than glorified exhibition games with over-priced tickets. I could've gone to what turned out to be an epic Widespread Panic show across the street, instead of watching a meaningless game.

I'd feel differently if we were talking about the Rose Bowl or one of the CFP bowls.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top