What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

If the Regents meeting is related to this issue and they are really looking at moving this quickly than the B1G must have told the Mountain pod we definitely have no interest and any additional expansion beyond Oregon and Washington and maybe Stanford will be a move into the Southeast.
Meh I never thought the Big 10 was a serious option for us.
Someone on 247 said the regents are having an emergency meeting tonight. Not sure If legit or not
same thing that somebody here mentioned yesterday?
 
Conversations with a few in the AD recently - apparently, the faculty LOVES being compared to their "academic peers" Cal, Stanford, Washington (may lose them) and UCLA (already lost them). At least two BOR members are big fans of PAC12 thru personal relationships and other faculty. CU's faculty has attended many academic conferences with other conference attendees, which will be probably lost going-forward

The other reason I know academics will try to intervene here is it's 100% consistent with the last 20+ years, since the "sex scandal " in 2001.

In the end, I don't expect this POV to prevail, but this is CU, so you never know.
You’re saying that you have contacts in the AD?
 
In a roundabout way, he's pushing his anti-progressive political agenda. Posters on 247 who credibly have contacts within the AD have completely dispelled this narrative.
Comedy Central GIF by The Jim Jefferies Show
 
I'm just gonna check in on this thread from time to time to find out when we're DOOMED, otherwise it is depressing af.
 
Meh I never thought the Big 10 was a serious option for us.

same thing that somebody here mentioned yesterday?
Apparently, CU has formed a survival alliance with Utah, ASU, and UA, who have eaten OSU and WSU, stabbed CAL to watch it die, and are paddling their tiny life-raft desperately toward the Gulf of Mexico.

Sadly, this is the best news I've heard in days.
 
Last edited:
Any info on 247 that can be leaked over here once past the 24 hour rule?
Oh, nothing crazy, just that this notion that CU faculty and admin are in awe of Stanford and Cal and would rather just follow them wherever they go, even if it's dropping football, is completely idiotic and just not true.

CU knows it needs football to maintain an athletic department (unlike Cal and Stanford). The hope is that this is a wake up call for the admin to start giving more of a ****.
 
Oh, nothing crazy, just that this notion that CU faculty and admin are in awe of Stanford and Cal and would rather just follow them wherever they go, even if it's dropping football, is completely idiotic and just not true.

CU knows it needs football to maintain an athletic department (unlike Cal and Stanford). The hope is that this is a wake up call for the admin to start giving more of a ****.
People really, really overestimate the amount of ****s that faculty give about any of this. Just an easy scapegoat
 
Oh, nothing crazy, just that this notion that CU faculty and admin are in awe of Stanford and Cal and would rather just follow them wherever they go, even if it's dropping football, is completely idiotic and just not true.

CU knows it needs football to maintain an athletic department (unlike Cal and Stanford). The hope is that this is a wake up call for the admin to start giving more of a ****.
Does Cal not need football?
 
My dream would be that the admin now sees how letting athletics languish led to us being locked out of the ultra nerd Big 10 conference and treat our next 10 years before the “CFB endgame” to make changes in an effort to squeak back into a good academic conference in the next round.

This requires critical thinking and self evaluation. This will never happen. But I can dream
 
Thoughtful breakdown by this guy on who would be attractive from the PAC and why. If you're looking for optimism, don't watch.

Well, one slide was a positive ...

581191F0-1903-447F-AB9C-7A6FB1A123A4.jpeg

Based on the rest of the deck thats probably not enough to overcome Stanford and Washingtons academics and SF media market. And as you can see Stanford is #3 on the list.

Maybe in the future we get in on some of the positives. Ill venture if we did they stick us with the lower payout tier like Rutgers and Maryland.

The video touches on the point about the importance of media markets and the strategy the B1G is employing validates that.

Money is killing college football as is CTE.
 
Last edited:
Some speculation here that the SEC is rumored to want to take 4 teams from the Pac 12 to establish a presence in all four time zones, with Oregon and Washington as the two main programs, and Denver and Phoenix as the two MTZ markets they covet..

A Move Out West​

There is educated speculation out there that ESPN and the SEC are seriously looking at adding four former Pac-12 schools to increase their imprint in all four time zones. Sports Illustrated has already laid out an in-depth piece as to what that could possibly look like and why it makes sense.

Interestingly enough, it sounds like Oregon and Washington are the main two. Most talk up to this point has had UO and UW heading to the Big Ten.

By that count it leaves two more open spots for some combination of Utah, Colorado, Arizona, and Arizona State, though the SI article specifically zeroed in on the Denver and Phoenix TV markets as the primary targets. This is also an interesting development if true due to the fact it has been reported those four schools have been in serious talks with the Big XII.



West​

This is the direction to watch, and in many way makes the most sense in the short term.

Should the SEC look beyond Texas, where it has the Dallas (5) and Houston (8) secure, the next major markets in that direction geographically are Phoenix (11) and Denver (16), which translates to Arizona State and Colorado. It would also open the door to California.


Consider this option for the SEC: Adding four teams from the Pac-12.

Phoenix to Seattle, which has been a common trip for years in the Pac-12, is roughly 1,100 miles in the air, and 1,400 miles driving.

Phoenix to Birmingham is 1,400 miles, just with more time-zone changes.

 
People really, really overestimate the amount of ****s that faculty give about any of this. Just an easy scapegoat
Also, it makes no sense. Academics don't give two ****s about athletic conference affiliation when it comes to doing research and going to academic conferences.
 
Some speculation here that the SEC is rumored to want to take 4 teams from the Pac 12 to establish a presence in all four time zones, with Oregon and Washington as the two main programs, and Denver and Phoenix as the two MTZ markets they covet..









I mean, one hand, playing SEC teams would be cool, looking at the scoreboard afterward, not so much.
 
I wonder if the SEC values the Denver market more than the B1G because there aren't a lot of SEC alums here. The B1G doesn't need CU to capture the market, in theory, but the SEC might need an SEC program to do so. Same in Phoenix.
 
Back
Top