What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

I even wonder how stable B1G & SEC will be. Eventually, the endpoint is probably ESPN saying, "These are the 48 teams we want in 4 regional groupings of 12 and we'll pay a lot more to each of you than you're making now." Anyone think the Ohio States of the world will give any fvcks about leaving the Purdues behind?
I think that's almost certainly the way things are going. I'm not convinced that the 4 regional groupings necessarily have a "Western" region, either. It might look like: Northeast, mid-Atlantic/Midwest, Southeast, Southwest.

If I were making things up, I'd end up pretty close to this:

MidwestNortheastSoutheastSouthwest
ArkansasPenn StateMiamiA&M
OUMarylandFSUUT
Oklahoma StateSyracuseGTBaylor
WisconsinNC StateClemsonTexas Tech
MinnesotaPittTennesseeArizona State
Notre DameUVAGeorgiaColorado
IowaVTFloridaUtah
NorthwesternDukeAlabamaUCLA
NebraskaUNCAuburnUSC
IllinoisOhio StateLSUOregon
MissouriMichiganSouth CarolinaWashington
KansasMichigan StateOle MissArizona
 
It may not happen this year, but we will continue to see major shifts and defections from the conferences other than the Big Ten and the SEC over the next few years.

Last thing CU wants to do is put itself in a position where it cannot make that jump if invited. College football is cyclical. It takes horrible luck / management to be down as long as we have. But there is no reason to think that we will permanently suck. Get rid of a useless AD and a boring incompetent coach, make a couple of good hires, have a couple of winning seasons and we are back on the national stage.

It would be moronic to wed ourselves to a contract where the best programs are constantly looking for a way out. And that is every conference other than the Big Ten and the SEC.
 
It should mean that the 4corner schools should bolt and force the decision for UO and Wash, rather than wait and have the decision made for them.

CU holds more cards joining now than if they come to the Big12 on a life raft.
I'm just wondering what Phil Knight is going to do to save the Pac 12.
 
4 corner schools should issue an ultimatum now and provide a roadmap for poaching B12 schools to PAC (short term) and helping SEC/B10 cut up the carcass of ACC (long term).

If UO and UW balk, then walk and join B12 without them.

4 corner schools now have all of the chips and can push UW/UO around since B10 isn’t doing anything right now
 
Serious question: Why would the SEC want Clemson, FSU or Miami? I get that from a brand perspective, they are nice, but the SEC already owns the TV/streaming market in the entire region, especially Florida, and elevating three potentially elite programs to the SEC level only dilutes the recruiting there.

If they were to kick out Vandy, Miss State and Arkansas and replace them with those three, then I can see the value, but I really don't understand the value in those three programs to the SEC as just pure expansion
 
Serious question: Why would the SEC want Clemson, FSU or Miami? I get that from a brand perspective, they are nice, but the SEC already owns the TV/streaming market in the entire region, especially Florida, and elevating three potentially elite programs to the SEC level only dilutes the recruiting there.

If they were to kick out Vandy, Miss State and Arkansas and replace them with those three, then I can see the value, but I really don't understand the value in those three programs to the SEC as just pure expansion
I largely agree. In fantasy baseball and fantasy football, I often pick up players I have no use for. Only to keep them off of other teams.
 
Serious question: Why would the SEC want Clemson, FSU or Miami? I get that from a brand perspective, they are nice, but the SEC already owns the TV/streaming market in the entire region, especially Florida, and elevating three potentially elite programs to the SEC level only dilutes the recruiting there.

If they were to kick out Vandy, Miss State and Arkansas and replace them with those three, then I can see the value, but I really don't understand the value in those three programs to the SEC as just pure expansion
Because having brand vs brand matchups generates ****loads of media revenue that is barely attached to local markets at all.
 
Serious question: Why would the SEC want Clemson, FSU or Miami? I get that from a brand perspective, they are nice, but the SEC already owns the TV/streaming market in the entire region, especially Florida, and elevating three potentially elite programs to the SEC level only dilutes the recruiting there.

If they were to kick out Vandy, Miss State and Arkansas and replace them with those three, then I can see the value, but I really don't understand the value in those three programs to the SEC as just pure expansion
Kick out those three, and who are the jobbers? South Carolina? Missouri? Every conference needs jobbers.
 
Serious question: Why would the SEC want Clemson, FSU or Miami? I get that from a brand perspective, they are nice, but the SEC already owns the TV/streaming market in the entire region, especially Florida, and elevating three potentially elite programs to the SEC level only dilutes the recruiting there.

If they were to kick out Vandy, Miss State and Arkansas and replace them with those three, then I can see the value, but I really don't understand the value in those three programs to the SEC as just pure expansion

Better have them with than potentially against you
 
Because having brand vs brand matchups generates ****loads of media revenue that is barely attached to local markets at all.
But they don't have to be in the SEC to play each other, just like what happens now.

Better have them with than potentially against you
But those three programs will never be on the same level as the new SEC, so why is the SEC worried about them?

I guess it would be a long term play for when they eventually do kick out the "jobbers" as @Not Sure calls them
 
Nothing. It’s dead.

Too bad, CU has little interest in rejoining the Big 12. I fully expect CU to recommit to staying in the PAC 12, regardless of the long-term risks to the AD.

As I expected, that appears to be the preference of the Chancellor, BOR and faculty reps. RG is just trying to find a way to keep getting paid $1 mm a year for no results, and with no accountability.
 
I could see a 'strengthening' of the (don't say) alliance of the new Pac10 and the ACC. Play about three OOC football games against a rival from the other conference and an equivalent amount of OOC in basketball. This TV package would cover a lot of markets.
 
But they don't have to be in the SEC to play each other, just like what happens now.


But those three programs will never be on the same level as the new SEC, so why is the SEC worried about them?

I guess it would be a long term play for when they eventually do kick out the "jobbers" as @Not Sure calls them
They need to be in the SEC to guarantee more of those big matchups for the networks to spend a billion dollars.
 
Back
Top