How do you think it would be received by the taxpaying public ... and donors who DON'T give a **** about football?
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_13803406
Just sayin'
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_13803406
Just sayin'
Well they can talk all they want, but I think Bohn just needs to be completely clear that this does not use a cent of tax dollars and that the revenue of the department which ALL Colorado athletics desperately need will dramatically drop due to loss of ticket sales etc if Hawkins is retained.
Plus, I believe his contract provides that we can pay him in scratch tickets.Hey, as long as he lives here, Hawkins will have to pay taxes. If we pay him $3.5 million, Colorado's tax revenue will go up, won't it?
How do you think it would be received by the taxpaying public ... and donors who DON'T give a **** about football?
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_13803406
Just sayin'
How do you think it would be received by the taxpaying public ... and donors who DON'T give a **** about football?
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/ci_13803406
Just sayin'
Most likely, there won't be a dime of taxpayer money that goes into this. Like it or not, there are specific donations that never would have been made if they weren't used for something related to a "football" item.
I beleive you can NOT donate specifically to the football program, but there are ways to donate that your intent can be carried out.
If there is a buyout, this is the most likely scenario.
You can make specific donations it just reduces your tax advantage.
Oh... so Oklahoma boosters donating to Rhett Bomar was legal :smile2: they just couldnt deduct it from their taxes? That must have been the problem
j/k
Looking at Boulder Chamber Of Commerce figures alone and discount Denver's, about hard-dollar and soft-dollar amounts per CU Game Day, it makes 10-15% revenue losses reach near million-dollar marks easily every year. And if attendance is reduced by more than 15% of this year's levels, those start reaching over a million dollars a year that's lost.2. The buyout is less expensive than the expected revenue losses if Hawkins were retained.
Most likely, there won't be a dime of taxpayer money that goes into this. Like it or not, there are specific donations that never would have been made if they weren't used for something related to a "football" item.
I beleive you can NOT donate specifically to the football program, but there are ways to donate that your intent can be carried out.
If there is a buyout, this is the most likely scenario.
you ****ing copy cat btw :lol:The Hugegroove Avatar does not resemble this remark!:smile2: