Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

bring beer back to folsom.

Of course by not selling beer at the stadium, you encourage people to get drunker than they otherwise would before the game and you also encourage people to sneak in hard alcohol which is easier to get wasted on than 3.2% beer. So you lose revenue and you make the situation worse at the same time. It's lunacy.
 
kalbuff said:
His last post did not say obscenely drunk. And that BA is not intoxicated, but it is "impaired" and the difference is 8 points against your license vs. 12 points. It is alcohol, and the concentration might be less but not as much as you obviously think.
Click to expand...

Jesus, you are the only one Pushing the legal aspect of it. We all know that you can pound as much 3.2 as we can get our hands on and it will do no more than give you a decent buzz and a whole lot of trips to the bathroom.
 
sackman said:
YOU of all people, trying to tell me that 3.2 beer can actually get you drunk. Puh-lease.
Click to expand...
When I was a student back in the 70's, they actually sold it in the Packer Grill in the Student Union on Friday's. I was from Louisiana, and didn't know WTF 3.2 beer was. Me and my friends had about 4, but all we did was pi$$. After that we went to Tulagi's and got the real thing.
 
Last edited:
77buff said:
When I was a student back in the 70's, they actually sold it in the Packer Grill in the Student Union on Friday's. I was from Louisiana, and didn't know WTF 3.2 beer was. Me and my friends had about 4, but all we did was pi$$. After that we went to Tulagi's and got the real thing.
Click to expand...

At UH there is a bar on campus
 
Nor Cal Buff said:
Of course by not selling beer at the stadium, you encourage people to get drunker than they otherwise would before the game and you also encourage people to sneak in hard alcohol which is easier to get wasted on than 3.2% beer. So you lose revenue and you make the situation worse at the same time. It's lunacy.
Click to expand...

^^this^^
 
Nor Cal Buff said:
Of course by not selling beer at the stadium, you encourage people to get drunker than they otherwise would before the game and you also encourage people to sneak in hard alcohol which is easier to get wasted on than 3.2% beer. So you lose revenue and you make the situation worse at the same time. It's lunacy.
Click to expand...

^^this^^
 
So I thought it was a pac 12 and before that b12 thing to not sell beer in the stadium? They started the no beer thing my freshman year. Needless to say I was very pissed.
 
The Walrus said:
Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.
Click to expand...

Wait till he gets started!!!

images


Now, where was he?

Australia.
 
kalbuff said:
YOU of all people, simply don't know what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

Oh, believe me. I know what I'm talking about. You can throw all your fancy pants numbers around all you want, smart guy. I know better. I've been there. I've lived it.
 
3.2 beer is essentially light beer. 3.2 is measured by weight, whereas other beers are listed by volume. 3.2 abw equals 4.0 abv. Bud Light, for example, is 4.2 abv.
 
Heywood said:
So I thought it was a pac 12 and before that b12 thing to not sell beer in the stadium? They started the no beer thing my freshman year. Needless to say I was very pissed.
Click to expand...

It is a CU thing that started during the 1995 season because of the student that died from falling off of the SUV on the road to chataqua.

There may be subsequent rules by the Big 12 and the Pac 12, but that is how it started. I strongly voiced my opposition as the Treasurer to IFC but I was not heard.
 
sackman said:
Oh, believe me. I know what I'm talking about. You can throw all your fancy pants numbers around all you want, smart guy. I know better. I've been there. I've lived it.
Click to expand...

Oh yah!! I was soaking up 3.2 at Tulagi's when you were in diapers. Just because you are the Obi-Wan Kebobi of All Buffs does not mean you are always correct. And my "fancy pants" numbers are correct and you are not correct that you just piss away 3.2 beer, at least not the alcohol in said beverage.

By the way the opinion about the absence of 3.2 beer and the resulting heavy consumption of stronger alcoholic beverages is spot on. It really is stupid to not have 3.2 at the games.
 
Skidmark said:
And the venders sell $4 steinlagers in the aisles of Aloha during the game. You don't even have to get out of your seat.
Click to expand...
That's a righteous price for a hand delivered brewski, and those vendors probably get tipped pretty good. CU is missing out on a real revenue producer, and it's not like the people who want to drink can't sneak alcohol into the stadium. Another example of a few people with their heads up their ass making moral decisions for everybody else. If you want to be a pr!ck about it, then stop selling it in the 3rd quarter.
 
kalbuff said:
Oh yah!! I was soaking up 3.2 at Tulagi's when you were in diapers. Just because you are the Obi-Wan Kebobi of All Buffs does not mean you are always correct. And my "fancy pants" numbers are correct and you are not correct that you just piss away 3.2 beer, at least not the alcohol in said beverage.

By the way the opinion about the absence of 3.2 beer and the resulting heavy consumption of stronger alcoholic beverages is spot on. It really is stupid to not have 3.2 at the games.
Click to expand...

So, as usual, you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. Shocking. I'll see you in... an hour and a half and we can carry on this conversation then.

And when did Tulagis serve 3.2?
 
sackman said:
And when did Tulagis serve 3.2?
Click to expand...

You know good and well that I argue for a living. When I began law school in 1967 in Boulder the town was dry!!! The only places you could "drink" was at Tulagi, The Sink and The Timber Tavern and they sold nothing but 3.2 beer. You could drink said beverage when you were 18. We managed to get our 17 yo dates in by deception which is another story. So 3.2 beer was indeed sort of considered a non alcoholic beverage as the town was considered "dry". I was out of law school for a couple of years and when I came back the town was "wet" and then I am not certain Tulagi sold 3.2 or regular beer. It was, by the way, the second most tap beer sold in the country after some bar in Cambridge, Mass (Harvard). Thus the immutable connection between CU and Harvard!
 
kalbuff said:
You know good and well that I argue for a living. When I began law school in 1967 in Boulder the town was dry!!!
Click to expand...

Hey! You said you were drinking there when I was in diapers. I wasn't in diapers in 1967. I wasn't even born yet.
 
kalbuff said:
You know good and well that I argue for a living. When I began law school in 1967 in Boulder the town was dry!!! The only places you could "drink" was at Tulagi, The Sink and The Timber Tavern and they sold nothing but 3.2 beer. You could drink said beverage when you were 18. We managed to get our 17 yo dates in by deception which is another story. So 3.2 beer was indeed sort of considered a non alcoholic beverage as the town was considered "dry". I was out of law school for a couple of years and when I came back the town was "wet" and then I am not certain Tulagi sold 3.2 or regular beer. It was, by the way, the second most tap beer sold in the country after some bar in Cambridge, Mass (Harvard). Thus the immutable connection between CU and Harvard!
Click to expand...

sackman said:
Hey! You said you were drinking there when I was in diapers. I wasn't in diapers in 1967. I wasn't even born yet.
Click to expand...

tape_measure.jpg

Would you two just get it over with already.
 
I proved many times that one can get quite drunk on 3.2 beer.
 
azbuff said:
To be fair, Sackman said "obscenely" drunk. I don't think anyone here considers .08 obscenely drunk. And I don't think a lot of us are 160 either.

Also, I did the same exercise using the same data and it came back with .069, which isn't legally drunk in nearly every state (or any state that I am aware of).
Click to expand...
.025 for me what do you guys weigh 160-170?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top