1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

1990 Question

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by BuffThat, Nov 28, 2007.

  1. BuffThat

    BuffThat Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    9
    What was the point difference in the coaches' poll between Tech and CU in 90?
     
  2. Buffarino

    Buffarino Math - how does it work? Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,556
    Likes Received:
    783
  3. BuffThat

    BuffThat Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    9
    thnx, and dr. tom voted CU #2 behind GT, right?
     
  4. 92Buff

    92Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    50
    I believe I read the a$$hat voted us 3, but what was the killer were his open statements about being the only coach in the nation who had played both teams andthat GT was a much better team.

    The idot was just jealous that Mac had turned an entire program around and won a national championship before he could.

    I have no respct for him whatsoever, and I hope fails miserably in his new role. Bitter - hell yes.
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2007
  5. RalphieMalph

    RalphieMalph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    176
    Yeah, I've always heard that he voted us #3. Had he voted us #2, the title would have been unanimous.
     
  6. BeachBronco

    BeachBronco Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    920
    Likes Received:
    25
    I could never figure that one out, we ended up putting a solid win on them in Stincoln and yet they got the Jellowjackets on a neutral field. Nebraskans want to know why we treat them like crap, well, there you go.......
     
  7. 92Buff

    92Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    50
    The key was not only a neutral field, but it was a VERY weak NU team that played in that game (in some cases third stringers were playing due to injuries and suspensions). Tom knew it and just wanted to be an a-hole.

    I was pissed when Mac didn't return the favor when TO was lobbying for his MNC in '94 when there was a Penn State team that was also undefeated and probably better. Mac was too respectable. He should have voted them around 20 or so just to make sure TO got the message.
     
  8. RalphieMalph

    RalphieMalph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    4,723
    Likes Received:
    176
    Do you know of a site/article/whatever that details this whole situation? "This whole situation" meaning the coaches' poll fiasco as well as the weakened Nebraska roster for their game with GT...
     
  9. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,650
    Likes Received:
    523
    The thing that really gets me about this is that going into the bowl games, CU had a fairly significant lead in the coaches poll.
     
  10. RuffBuff

    RuffBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,603
    Likes Received:
    262
    beating a Nebraska team in the Citrus Bowl is A LOT different than beating them in Lincoln. :sad2:
     
  11. MSBuff

    MSBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,586
    Likes Received:
    81
    Just to add to to confusion, I had heard he voted us #4.
     
  12. 92Buff

    92Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    50
    Never went looking for it since it was before the intarnet thing was created. I may try to look around if I get a few moments, though.
     
  13. 92Buff

    92Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    50
    I found a quick article here that doesn't give you the lineups but definitely signifies a husker team that had packed it in after the loss to CU (I love the author's last name).

    Beating a team who didn't beat a ranked opponent and on a losing streak is probably as good as beating number 1 ND in the Orange Bowl, right? :huh:

    ---------

    Wed, 02 Jan 1991

    [SIZE=+1]NU Can't Avoid Head-On Wreck, Leaving Tech a Heck of a Claim[/SIZE]
    Lee Barfknecht
    Pull out the Nebraska football history book and an eraser.
    A big eraser.

    Revisions aplenty are needed after the 13th- and 19th-ranked Huskers' 45-21 Citrus Bowl loss Tuesday to No. 2 Georgia Tech.

    That setback before a record crowd of 72,328 at Citrus Bowl Stadium produced the following entries, few of which NU fans will want to remember:

    Four straight bowl losses, a first in the school's 29-game postseason history.
    45 points allowed, matching the most ever given up by a Tom Osborne team in his 18 years as head coach. That mark was established in Nebraska's previous game, a 45-10 loss at Oklahoma. Thus, the 45 points also were the most ever allowed in a bowl game.

    The 90 points allowed in two games are the most since 1945 losses of 61-7 to Minnesota and 54-14 to Indiana.

    Three losses in four games (Colorado, Oklahoma and Georgia Tech) is a first for Osborne.

    No victories over ranked teams for the second straight year. The last time before 1989 and 1990 was 1967.

    But perhaps most painful is that Nebraska could drop out of the national rankings at season's end, something that hasn't happened since 1968.

    "I'm afraid it's going to happen," senior offensive tackle Tom Punt said. "A 9-3 Nebraska isn't what people expect."
    Junior middle guard Pat Engelbert agreed.

    "As far as respect goes, we haven't beaten a top-ranked team," he said. "Maybe if we're lucky, we'll only drop out of one poll and stay about 20th in the other." Osborne said he doesn't know how the polls will shake out, and said little about whether the Huskers deserve to be ranked after losses to the nation's top two teams entering New Year's Day and a third to Oklahoma, once ranked as high as fifth.
     
  14. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,881
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    my how things have changed
     
  15. CSU Husker

    CSU Husker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    9,537
    Likes Received:
    179
    According to most people, you are wrong. After all, FS was fired after a 9-3 season, right?
     
  16. Buffarino

    Buffarino Math - how does it work? Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    24,556
    Likes Received:
    783
    Not necessarily. Callahan had not one, but two losing seasons before he was canned. That's a far cry from 9-3.
     
  17. Junction

    Junction Moderator Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,534
    Likes Received:
    1,000,005
    Plus, most people certainly don't expect a 9-3 season from the fuskers these days. That is still true, even if the circumstances are a bit different now... :smile2:
     
    Scotch likes this.
  18. Scotch

    Scotch Registered User Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    9,804
    Likes Received:
    430
    Well Done! :thumbsup:

    REP!!!! :lol:
     
  19. absinthe

    absinthe Ambitious but rubbish. Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    25,881
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    coincidentally wasn't that the last time you were 9-3?
     
  20. Coloradosker

    Coloradosker Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    27
    BS. You know just as well as I do that 94 NU, CU, and Miami would've killed that team. They had absolutely no defense and played a very weak Oregon team to win the Rose Bowl and go undefeated. You guys were the second best team that season with Miami #3.
     
  21. Scotch

    Scotch Registered User Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    9,804
    Likes Received:
    430
    The point still stands that unlike TO, Coach Mac at least had the class to rank the fuskers #1 over Penn State. CU was also better than G-Tech. and if it wasn't for Bienemy's 5 fumbles in Lincoln in '90 that score would have been worse than 27-12. I don't know for sure, but I'll bet Slick Rick ranked the fuskers #1 in '97 after playing both them and Michigan. And bear in mind CU almost won that game, and was blown out by Michigan.
     
  22. 92Buff

    92Buff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,960
    Likes Received:
    50
    I agree with the point that we were top two - frankly I say CU was better than NU but had one unbelievably bad game that season. We choked so that is that.

    I guarantee our talent was better - proven by the fact that all but one starter that season on BOTH O and D started in the NFL at some point. Probably the best CU team that has ever been fielded.

    Regardless, NU, CU and Penn State were way above the rest of the country without a doubt.

    My question still stands - why should NU have got sole MNC when there were two undefeated teams? Penn State deserved a share of that one.
     
  23. Lt.Col.FrankSlade

    Lt.Col.FrankSlade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,553
    Likes Received:
    207
    Wasn't 1990 the year that Oklahoma planted Nebraska's starting QB into the metal benches -- so he couldn't even play in the bowl game?
     
  24. 66BUFF

    66BUFF FTW Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,865
    Likes Received:
    315
    was that mickey joseph
     
  25. Lt.Col.FrankSlade

    Lt.Col.FrankSlade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,553
    Likes Received:
    207

    Yes, I think so.
     
  26. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,650
    Likes Received:
    523
    Yes, I also think that's who it was and I think that was the same year, but I don't recall whether or not he played in the bowl game. :huh:
     

Share This Page