If you’re our resident zebra that says a lot about the quality of this board.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2024 NCAA tournament general games thread
- Thread starter torero
- Start date
I think there's a little untangling of the extra year of COVID eligibility and NIL/Transfer Portal that needs to be done.
Both are contributing to more experienced players spread across more rosters.
I quibble on some of those- ACC had two games and won both, one a top seed (UNC) drubbing a low seed, and one (NCSU) pulling a convincing "upset" over a team that was seeded higher than them. The Pac12 had the same (Arizona and Oregon, respectively), but also had WSU winning. Let's not forget that the only reason that there wasn't 3 ACC games yesterday was because one of their teams got destroyed Tuesday by the "worst" team from Day 1.
Also, I'm not sure how McNeese State can be considered a bust. They had a lackluster resume and wouldn't have made the tournament if they weren't an AQ, and Gonzaga's metrics indicated they were a much, much better team. Vegas favored Gonzaga by 7 points. how is the answer NOT UK?
but yes, we can all agree CSU is the worst. And I don't mean just at basketball.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
Sure. I would still send the three guys who worked that game home though. That call was terrible.
That can't happen this time of year. Padilla led the crew. He needs to sit the rest of the tournament.
Yes. This is the last year of so many 6th year seniors who are 23/24 years old.
Except for BYU, of course
+~2-2.5 units yesterday on that strategy
They are just reinforcing that you made the correct decision.
Possibly a few years too late . . .
This is Oregon's bread and butter. Couisnard is 25.
We should print 1000 of these out as posters and hand them out to students next time the Rams come to the Keg.
C'mon Blippi isn't that bad
****ing Blippi can eat a sack full of Richards.
Onions!!!
FAU on a 13-2 run to take the lead with a minute left over Northwestern. Flagrant foul that wasn't even called a foul before video review to begin with while stopping a NW fastbreak a big part of it. I hate the way these flagrant foul calls affect the game. Should it have been called a foul live? Yes. Was the flagrant foul penalty way too severe? Also Yes.
I disagree - it was definitely a flagrant. They just shouldn't have stopped the play when NW had the runnout.
By rule, it's flagrant. I'm saying I dislike the rule. It's a foul. Wasn't malicious in anyway. I know that intent isn't part of the rule anymore, I think it should be. People get hit with elbows... it happens. The penalty is way too severe.
Normal people don't flail about like that - he was swinging to keep space open.
It's a foul. That's why fouls exist.
It's a flagrant because of the unnecessary contact to the head. Its literally why they introduced the entire idea - to keep people from getting hurt.
