1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Big 12 to remain Big 12? In name only

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by Hugegroove, May 23, 2011.

  1. Hugegroove

    Hugegroove Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,726
    Likes Received:
    121
  2. Tractor

    Tractor Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,899
    Likes Received:
    307
    Tards
     
  3. Buffnik

    Buffnik Real name isn't Nik Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    80,644
    Likes Received:
    16,308
    My son is only 2 1/2 years old and even he knows that the Big 12 having 10 teams while the Big 10 has 12 teams is ****ing stupid.
     
  4. ScottyBuff

    ScottyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    91
    Chip Brown says Texas counts for 3, which is why the Big 12 had trademark the name Big 14 years ago.
     
  5. azbuff

    azbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,670
    Likes Received:
    284
    Meh. It doesn't really have a choice if it wants to maintain its brand and the goodwill associated with it. Certainly, if there wasn't already a BIG 10, the BIG 12 would have changed its name, but it's kinda stuck now. Would've been smarter not to go with a BIG # to begin with.
     
  6. BuffNut99

    BuffNut99 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    13,082
    Likes Received:
    2,498
    Hold your horses for this... branding initiative...
     
  7. BuffaloSoldier76

    BuffaloSoldier76 Unsound Meat Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    229
    ...as was Big 8...as was Southwest Conference, but everybody sure as **** dropped those names (which had 40 and 82 years of history behind them respectively) when the number and geography no longer applied to those leagues. Those were the banners under which a lot more competition was held and significantly more national championships were attained under.

    The Big 10 at least has 115 years of branding as the Big 10 to fall back on as the excuse for retaining their name. The Big 12 has only 15 years of marketing and branding behind it. Don't try to represent that the Big 12's history is comparable to that of the Big 10 Mr. Beebe, at least not with a straight face. 15 years is nothing to sneeze at, but if the Pac-10 can change to the Pac-12 to accurately reflect the number of teams it represents, you can certainly pick a new name for your league...so sorry the name you want is trademarked.
     
  8. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,963
    Likes Received:
    2,660
    WooHoo, slanted Roman Numerals...
     
  9. TimmyDUBs

    TimmyDUBs Dirty haole Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,567
    Likes Received:
    949
    How does Beebe have a job?!?!? and how does he get an ounce of credit for 'saving' the conference? He is the most worthlessly overpaid person in NCAA . . .
     
  10. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,963
    Likes Received:
    2,660
    As long as he kisses DeLoss Dodds' fanny, he'll have a job....
     
  11. ScottyBuff

    ScottyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    91
    with Horns too?
     
  12. PhillyBuff

    PhillyBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    6,988
    Likes Received:
    294
    fify :thumbsup:
     
  13. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,482
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    I suspect the Big 12 will eventually add another two schools to the mix at some point. That assumes the league doesn't collapse beforehand.
     
  14. CUFan

    CUFan Welcome back Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    6,958
    Likes Received:
    468
    I agree they are probably looking to add. However, if UT gets paid the most (and controls the league), ATM and OU get the second biggest slices and the rest are relegated to the third tier, would the new ones get fourth tier treatment? I am sure there are plenty of non-BCS schools that would want to join the Big 12, but man that would be an iffy proposition. Fourth class citizen in a dying league.
     
  15. GregInArlington

    GregInArlington Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,909
    Likes Received:
    534
    I wonder if TCU would think about joining them. A DFW school would be a good addition. (even though I would love to see the Big 12 go down in flames). A Houston or SA school would be good as well, but there aren't any good candidates in those cities.
    Texas State in San Marcos is about to join the WAC, that school has about 35,000 kids, is undergoing a major facilities upgrade, and is 30 min from Austin (well within Deloss's control).
     
  16. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,482
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    If, for instance, they added Memphis and CSU (just as an example), the payouts to those two schools would immediately quadruple. Most non BCS schools would gratefully accept fourth class citizenship in the Big 12 for that kind of bump in revenues.
     
  17. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,482
    Likes Received:
    4,483

    I doubt TCU would be interested in being UT's lapdog. They just got a big bump in revenues from joining the Big East. If the Big 12 expands, I suspect it would be outside the state of Texas. They need more televisions. Memphis, Tulane, UNM, CSU, Air Force, BYU would all be possibilities, IMO. None add substantially, but would bring some television sets that they don't already have.
     
  18. GregInArlington

    GregInArlington Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,909
    Likes Received:
    534
    I dont' see them expanding outside of Texas. That would be the smart thing to do - that's what Larry Scott would do. The Big 12 has Dan Beebe at the helm... :doh:
     
  19. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,482
    Likes Received:
    4,483
    Excellent point. You're absolutely correct. Beebe (re: Dodds/Mack) would probably prefer to add North Texas and UT-San Antonio so they can get the championship game and not really have to pay anything more for it. Please accept my apologies for thinking rationally.
     
  20. GregInArlington

    GregInArlington Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,909
    Likes Received:
    534
    Apology accepted. You keep your rational thoughts to your PAC-12 conference, full of nerdy academic excellence and intelligence.

    Living down here so long has allowed their ways of thinking to seep into my brain. There is a little voice in my head with deep Texas accent that says: "to get to the champ-yun-ship, we need-a add some other state in-stit-u-shuns. we still keep the money in the UT system and dont have to worry about losing to any competitive teams."

    I know a ton of people in Austin who were very excited about the new Big 12 because it is less competitive and there is no longer a championship game to have to win to get to the title. They don't care about the quality of the games they see at all, they just care about getting 12 W's. I couldn't disagree with them more.
     

Share This Page