1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

If I hear one more Regent candidate tell me he/she want's to keep CU affordable...

Discussion in 'University of Colorado Elected Officials and Polit' started by sackman, Oct 19, 2012.

  1. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,534
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    I'm going to scream.

    What the hell? CU isn't designed to be affordable. It's designed to offer the finest level of higher education possible. We have tons of affordable higher education options. Junior colleges, community colleges, etc. CU isn't meant to be affordable. It was built to be excellent, not affordable.

    Just once, I'd like to see a candidate for Regent say that he/she wants to improve CU across the board. To strive for excellence in all areas. Academic standing, athletics, research, all of it. Nobody is saying that. They are all concentrating on the wrong stuff, IMO.

    We have the wrong people running for Regent. This sucks.
     
  2. dio

    dio Admin Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    30,133
    Likes Received:
    2,557
    Thats what I said in my email to Joe Neguse - Why doesn't CU strive for excellence in everything?

    He never responded.
     
  3. Liver

    Liver modded mod Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    22,872
    Likes Received:
    2,692
    it is the mission of a public school to try to be accessible to all students, regardless of economic background. i agree that there are plenty of alternatives within the state to CU, but none offer everything that CU-boulder has to offer. cal is one of the finest schools in the nation and doesn't charge a premium above what other uc schools here charge.

    CU is in a bit of different spot, in that it appears likely that state funding is going to continue to decrease. at the point that the school becomes private or quasi-private, then i'd agree that affordability is no longer a core requirement. but, until then, the school should not be made totally inaccessible to a wide swath of colorado kids just on the basis of cost.
     
  4. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,534
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    It's not the mission of the school to be affordable. It's the mission to provide a first class higher education. It's the mission of the junior colleges and community college feeder schools like Metro and Front Range Community College to be affordable. If you want affordable and a CU education, you get your associates from Front Range and then transfer to CU to finish. That's the affordable option. You can't simultaneously worry about affordability and excellence. While not mutually exclusive, they are not entirely compatable, either. The quality of a CU education has decreased in recent years while the school concerns itself with being affordable.
     
  5. OUBuff

    OUBuff American Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Messages:
    5,205
    Likes Received:
    1,137
    [video=youtube;eiRGRvE_Wqg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiRGRvE_Wqg[/video]


    Sorry... couldn't help it
     
  6. SuperiorBuff

    SuperiorBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,765
    Likes Received:
    1,126
    That's the most truthful line in the entire movie.
     
  7. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,534
    Likes Received:
    4,526
    It also struck me that CU has an affordable option. It's called CU-Denver. A quick peek at the difference in tuition between CU-Boulder and CU-Denver reveals that a resident undergrad taking a full class load at CU -Denver will pay $3,388 per semester. Apparently, that covers all fees (there wasn't a separate accounting of fees, so I'm making the assumption). At CU-Boulder, base tuition for an Arts & Science resident undergrad is $4,028 per semester, plus fees of an additional $628, bringing the total cost to $4,653/Semester. That's a savings of $1,265 per semester at CU-Denver compared to CU-Boulder. The reason for the difference is obvious - CU-Boulder has more bells & whistles. It has dorms, cafeterias, a police department, an athletic department, student centers, research facilities, etc. All that makes CU-Boulder a great place, but it's not cheap.
     
  8. Buffenuf

    Buffenuf massive tool

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,575
    Likes Received:
    299
    You quality and affordability? Watch the number of administrators versus faculty. Keep the number of admin types low.

    You only need so many assistant vice provosts of diversity on staff! Say....about one.
     
  9. MtnBuff

    MtnBuff Not allowed in Barzil 2 Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    26,471
    Likes Received:
    2,360
    You want affordability?

    Win a bunch of football games, inspire alums and others to fund a boatload of merit based scholarships, use them on students who not only increase the quality of your student body but also wouldn't be able to attend CU with or without the regent candidates definition of affordable.
     

Share This Page