Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by wsp4820, Dec 5, 2009.
UT had a horrible game plan, with McCoy mostly playing sitting duck. They had success with him moving, but kept him standing still too much. Suh, though, what a monster...
Tonight changed my opinion on Suh...not only is he the best defensive player in CFB, but he does deserve Heisman talk. Not the award, IMO, but he should by in NYC.
Pretty damned boring game. Nuggets were more interesting.
Nice ending, though.
Suh is a monster. McCoy doesn't even deserve to be invited for this disaster of a game. Glad the both will be gone though.
Some typical Buff fans responses in here. And I agree on the point about Suh being too good on that play. If hadn't pressured McCoy, game over, NU Big 12 Champs!:wow:
What do you consider a typical Buff fan response?
No more typical than the sCUm posts over at huskerpedia. You don't mind trashing cu over there.
Why aren't you on a texas board instead of here?
It is somewhat odd that a ****ster troll is crying on a Colorado board after losing to Texas.
I want to know what are the "typical responses" that trouble you. We are saying Suh is good, so good in fact that he cost the fuskers the game. Ultimately hilarious!
No, ultimately hilarious was 70-3. :lol:
hilarious will be watching CU football die slowly over the next decade.:lol:
Hilarious is the return of the Big Red Machine to the top of the big 12 and soon the nation.
Shouldn't you be bragging on a texas site? I guess it is a rivalry.
Colorado is 1-1 against Texas in Big XII Championship games in this decade. Don't think the ****sters have won one.
Have you beat a top 20 team yet?
hilarious is 293394 turnovers bvs iowe stateate.
haha, I predicted it - only fuskers would think they deserve to win by scoring 12 points (same thing happened in the VaTech game) :lol:
Typical CU response coming anytime now. I'd bring a poncho, umbrella and SWAT shield the next time you leave the house.
Not since 2001.:lol:
Sorry, I have to call you out on this one. The fuskers "never ever" thought the "deserved" to win the VaTech game. They came away from that game feeling they could play with anyone. They did however, feel they had a chance to win the game. Nothing more!
Go do the fact checks yourself in any of the Nebraska newspapers or the Virginia newspapers.
It's a ridiculous statement because Suh is the main reason they were in the game in the first place.
I know funny, and polka is funny.
Why should the best defensive player not get Heisman talk?
He's a DT putting up LB stats in tackles and DE stats in sacks and TFL.
I agree defensive players should be allowed to win a Heisman. The fact that they don't shows that the Heisman award is a hype award, and not an award to the truly best player in college football.
I haven't seen a better college player than Suh this year. I'll be shocked if he's not the #1 overall pick.
And it is ironic he got into the backfield 1 second too early on the almost last play of the game.:smile:
I'll say this, though. You guys should have been 11-1 heading into the B12C game. Crazy when you have no offense. If I had a Heisman vote, I'd give it to Suh. Especially since NU's secondary was average and their LBs were below average this year. The d-line was almost completely responsible for the team's success this year.
I never go to husker sites or nub newspapers, I'm not that needy. My comment was based entirely on bs I read on this site or heard from friends at work.
Separate names with a comma.