What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Pac-12 expansion is now inevitable

truckero.jpg

"Hi I am from out of town and late to a meeting, can you tell me where your AD office is at?"
 
http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2016/7/2...larry-scott-big-12-realignment-texas-Oklahoma

Sacky will hate this article.

The old adage of the swimming shark nevertheless applies. Either you are swimming or you are dying in this day and age of college athletics. Larry Scott needs to be swimming like a shark and he needs to be doing it right this minute.

There is another consideration here and the shark analogy continues to apply. Just as bigger sharks have been known to eat the smaller of their species, the PAC-12 cannot assume that it is not the hunted in this sea of change.
 
Because outsiders see the struggles we've had in football and assume we regret making the move.

Agreed. And they see that the Pac makes less $$ than other conferences, and because Denver/Boulder is quite appealing to away fan bases. Plus it's a conveniently easy article to write.
 
Are we naieve? Is it?

If the Big XII adds 2 to 4 more strategic schools, yes, I believe the Pac 12 will be the weakest P5 conference. They will continue to fall behind their competing conferences, especially if they are continually relegated to midnight eastern kickoffs on a network no one can watch east of Denver.

It may be a long shot, but stealing a few Big XII schools, in order to kill the conference, is the smart long-term play. Even if it costs revenue initially.
 
If the Big 12 is able to lure Nebraska back, adds BYU, Houston and ???, I could see real staying power with that conference and not just a money grab for TV contracts (zero change Nebraska and BYU take a back seat in the TV deal $$ share).

If they expand with Memphis, UCF, Houston and Cincy, then I think it's a clear money grab for the next 8 years with real potential of dissolving after.
 
Yeah is just all clickbait. At least RG has been straightforward about it both on the DC and with fans via email



I love that RG takes the time to reply to fans - I feel like that's something that a lot of other AD's wouldn't bother with...
 
We just need to expand to the PAC-20 and dominate everything west of the Mississippi that matters. It would look like this -

Houston
Whorns
Tech
Sooners

OSU
ISU
KSU
KU

CU
Utes
Wildcats
Sundevils

USC
UCLA
Bears
Trees

OSU
Whoregon
Huskies
Pirate crew
 
We just need to expand to the PAC-20 and dominate everything west of the Mississippi that matters. It would look like this -

Houston
Whorns
Tech
Sooners

OSU
ISU
KSU
KU

CU
Utes
Wildcats
Sundevils

USC
UCLA
Bears
Trees

OSU
Whoregon
Huskies
Pirate crew
Swap the Sooners and ISU and this isn't bad.
 
If the Big 12 is able to lure Nebraska back, adds BYU, Houston and ???, I could see real staying power with that conference and not just a money grab for TV contracts (zero change Nebraska and BYU take a back seat in the TV deal $$ share).

If they expand with Memphis, UCF, Houston and Cincy, then I think it's a clear money grab for the next 8 years with real potential of dissolving after.

That's been one line of thought down here. The big integer conference's tv contract ends in 2025, iirc. Talk is that if they don't make a big splash in realignment that the network/carriers won't be willing to reup.

Adding a Cinci, a Memphis, a directional florida school, and/or a Houston, and the conference goes boom in 2025.
 
Everyone talks about OU and OSU being tied at the hip politically. Same with Texas and (whoever's alma matter the current Gov come from). No one speaks of KU and KSU that way. Is that because the situation is publicly known to not have the same political friction, or because no one cares that much about this scenario to even think about this point?

For the record, it flashed my mind once or twice. This wasn't enough to warrant a post asking about it until I saw the 20 team hypothetical above.
 
It is naive to think schools in the conference are going to be able to handle the BS surrounding the Pac-12 Network for much longer.

After adding Frontier, I'd expect the distribution to reach 2M this FY. And that is probably more than CU and quite a few schools could do on their own.

Big 12 schools love to inflate their tier 3 numbers. Only schools over that 2M mark are Texas, Oklahoma and probably Kansas. But depending on the day you get Boren (Oklahoma) to talk, OU makes anywhere from less than 2M up to 6M. Their Fox deal pays them 4M a year for the rights and 1.8M for their production costs. But Boren has said in the past their production is more than the 1.8.

This is why everyone but Texas has been wanting a conference network. But TV has told them they have no appetite.
 
It would be awesome for Scott to gain a ton of leverage from adding schools like Texas and Oklahoma and then make DirecTV pay a higher fee than the ones they signed with the cable companies and dish network just for being a pain in the ass for so long.
 
Back
Top