OKCBuff
Well-Known Member
Just wondering what most on here would want if it turns out the Pac only adds Utah and it becomes the Pac-12.
In my mind, I see four options:
1. North/South setup (CU, UU, UO, OSU, UW, WSU vs. Cal, Stan, UCLA, USC, UA, ASU)
2. East/West setup (CU, UU, ASU, UA, USC, UCLA vs. Cal, Stan, UO, OSU, UW, WSU)
3. Zipper format (City/state rivals placed in opposite divisions, but schedule is such that cross-divisional rivals play annually:
CU-UU
UA-ASU
UCLA-USC
CAL-STAN
UO-OSU
UW-WSU
4. Something else (please explain)
So, what do you think? I believe the NW schools would never go for all of the California teams in one division, so I think Nos. 2 or 3 is more likely than anything else.
In my mind, I see four options:
1. North/South setup (CU, UU, UO, OSU, UW, WSU vs. Cal, Stan, UCLA, USC, UA, ASU)
2. East/West setup (CU, UU, ASU, UA, USC, UCLA vs. Cal, Stan, UO, OSU, UW, WSU)
3. Zipper format (City/state rivals placed in opposite divisions, but schedule is such that cross-divisional rivals play annually:
CU-UU
UA-ASU
UCLA-USC
CAL-STAN
UO-OSU
UW-WSU
4. Something else (please explain)
So, what do you think? I believe the NW schools would never go for all of the California teams in one division, so I think Nos. 2 or 3 is more likely than anything else.