Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by Unleash Hell, Aug 8, 2009.
Nope, if it's muscle like he said, and not fat, then I think he will help bowl over people.
Maybe it would help if we actually got the correct number. This is like the 5th different number I have seen thrown out there.
I feel like his frame is large enough to handle the weight. If you look at the pictures he doesn't seem to be too large or fat. If the speed is still there I don't mind it at all. Scott hasn't shown that he is much of a cutter more of a straight ahead kind of runner.
With speedy now we have thunder and lightning. :woot:
nope. he still looked slender at practice.
222 was confirmed by Pat Ridgell, I like Pat so it's true!:smile2:
Who gives a crap what the exact no of lbs is? Focus on what's important; can he play better than last year, is he in better shape, can he use the weight to his advantage or is a slimmer faster RB better? With Speedy in the backfield, I kind of like DS being the bigger bruiser back.
I know I'll admit, it was a ****ty poll choice today. I just got up from a long night and felt rushed to make a poll. I remember the last time I didn't make a poll, FC was pisssssssssed!:lol:
He should be down about five pounds by the time the season starts so he should be good. By all accounts, he looks like a different guy this year.
I want him at 215lbs and he'll get there. There was no way he was going to stay at 4% BF at 200lbs like he was at the spring. It's near impossible to keep your BF that low. 8% is around where he should hover at. Anything more than 12% and it's time to get a little worried. I don't think he would have worked hard to get to 4% only to piss it away.
Damn it, I voted wrong. I don't have a problem with the weight considering this is in shape weight as opposed to haven't worked out in months weight. He'll have a little heavier hammer and the ability to resist injury.
Separate names with a comma.