The problem with the poll is that what one "expected" is a variable.
1. Always 1.How is that a problem? This is simply asking if people are feeling better or worse about the Buffs while removing that variable.
If you want to go deeper into the question, people can respond to this post:
On the following scale, where were you prior to the spring practices and where are you now:
0 - Thank God that Drake isn't on the 2010 schedule
1 - Thank God that Montana State isn't on the 2010 schedule
2 - Thank God that Toledo isn't on the 2010 schedule
3 - Thank God that West Virginia isn't on the 2010 schedule
4 - Thank God that Texas isn't on the 2010 schedule
5 - DBT is a pessimist
IMO, the special teams play is going to have to step it up.
I voted slightly worse.
I thought Hansen's passes would look much better. He was very inaccurate on most of his throws. Also, I was not impressed with Quick, who I'd heard was tearing things up. The secondary getting burned wasn't good either.
On the plus side, Cefalo looked great, but I don't want to pin my hopes on a guy of his size.
Now, I didn't watch every play in the spring game, but I'm curious as to what makes you say "he was very inaccurate on most of his throws." I see a comment like that and then I look at his stat line: 17 for 22, 170 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs. That is 77.3% completion.
Do you mean his placement is off?