Can some explain, or point me in the right direction, about why some players never get rated? And why do we select unrated players?
Thanks.
Thanks.
:rofl:Unrated players players are selected because they can play.
Can some explain, or point me in the right direction, about why some players never get rated? And why do we select unrated players?
Thanks.
Umm, no. No we did not.Thats why there are the # ratings. On ESPN, you can be a 79 but a 4* or a 79 3*... lat years class we had two 4*'s but then we also had i believe three 79's that were 3*... so in all reality we had five 4*'s last year...
I have a smart question. For reals.
Do the rating sites grade on some sort of bell curve? Like, they will only give out X amount of 5*s, and Y mount of 4*s, and Z amount of 3*s, etc. Thus, it is possibly to have classes which might be much stronger or weaker in the 3* range?
Umm, no. No we did not.
You can say "we had 5 guys rated with a number that usually results in a 4 star" but not "in all reality we had 5 guys who were 4 stars."Norgard was a 79...
You can say "we had 5 guys rated with a number that usually results in a 4 star" but not "in all reality we had 5 guys who were 4 stars."
See the difference?
I have a smart question. For reals.
Do the rating sites grade on some sort of bell curve? Like, they will only give out X amount of 5*s, and Y mount of 4*s, and Z amount of 3*s, etc. Thus, it is possibly to have classes which might be much stronger or weaker in the 3* range?