What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Who's got the youngest team in the Pac-12?

RSSBot

News Junkie
By Ted Miller

Coaches love to say, "We're young." Sometimes it's true. Sometimes it sounds like an excuse. Sometimes it's both.

Being young often is a negative -- experience is important -- but a lot of fans immediately start to imagine all those young players combining the talents that earned them starting jobs with experience in future seasons.

So which Pac-12 teams are "young?"

We went through the latest conference depth charts available and counted how many projected starters are freshmen, redshirt freshmen or sophomores.

A qualifier. This is an inexact science. For one, many teams list more than 11 starters on one or both sides of the ball. We've included all position players listed as a No. 1 on the depth chart. Second, starting lineups are still fluid, so some of these guys might not end up as starters, and some youngsters won't emerge until the final days of preseason camp.

But this is a best guess.

Washington (12): OG Colin Tanigawa (RFr.), OG Colin Porter (So.), OT Erik Kohler (So.), TE Austin Seferian-Jenkins (TFr.), QB Keith Price (So.), WR Kevin Smith (So.), DE Hau'oli Jamora (So.), OLB Princeton Fuimaono (So.), OLB John Timu (TFr.), Rush Josh Shirley (RFr.), FS Nate Felner (So.), SS Sean Parker (So.).

Reaction: It's fair to say that if the Huskies improve upon their 7-6 finish of a year ago, there will be plenty of reasons for optimism in 2012. Must, however, make note that the Huskies list 24 positions on their depth chart, so, for example, "Rush" end Josh Shirley isn't an every-down player.

USC (9): OT Kevin Graf (So.), OG Aundrey Walker (TFr.), WR Robert Woods (So.), FB Soma Vainuku (TFr.), RB Dillon Baxter (So.), DT George Uko (RFr.), LB Dion Bailey (RFr.), Hayes Pullard (RFr.), CB Nickell Robey (So).

Reaction: These young players will form the foundation of a program trying to weather severe scholarship restrictions due to NCAA sanctions.

Washington State (9): WR Marquess Wilson (So.), OG John Fullington (So.), FB Jared Byers (So.), DT Kalafitoni Pole (RFr.), LB Sekope Kaufusi (So.), LB C.J. Mizell (So.), CB Nolan Washington (So.), SS Deone Bucannon (So.), CB Damante Horton (So.).

Reaction: A nice crew of young players for coach Paul Wulff. Will he get to enjoy them as they become veterans?

Arizona (8): WR Richard Morrison (So), OT Mickey Baucus (RFr.), OG Chris Putton (So.), OT Fabbians Ebbele (RFr.), DT Justin Washington (So), NT Sione Tuihalamaka (So.), CB Jonathan McKnight, FS Marquis Flowers (So.).

Reaction: The Wildcats are young on both lines. On the plus side, all five O-line starters will be back in 2012.

Colorado (6): WR Paul Richardson (So), OT David Bakhtiari (So), C Daniel Munyer (RFr.), OT Jack Harris (So), DE Chidera Uzo-Diribe (So), CB Parker Orms (So.).

Reaction: There could be a seventh youngster on this list, depending on how things shake out at cornerback. Richardson is a guy you will hear about this fall. A little surprised by the youth on the O-line.

Stanford (5): OG Kevin Danser (So.), FB Ryan Hewitt (So.), DE Ben Gardner (So.), OLB Trent Murphy (So.), CB Barry Browning (So.).

Reaction: These guys -- all new starters -- will be critical for the Cardinal this fall, at least if Stanford wants to remain a top-10 team.

Utah (5): OG Jeremiah Tofaeono (So), WR Dres Anderson (RFr.), DE Joe Kruger (So.), LB Brian Blechen (So.), SS Eric Rowe (TFr.).

Reaction: This feels like a list of guys who will -- at least one day -- get all-conference consideration.

Arizona State (4): OT Evan Finkenberg (So), DT Will Sutton (So.), DE Junior Onyeali (So.), CB Osahon Irabor (So.).

Reaction: Ditto with the comment on the Utes. The Sun Devils are a veteran team, but this is a strong foursome of sophomores.

Oregon (4): C Hroniss Grasu (RFr), WR Josh Huff (So), DT Wade Keliikipi (RFr), DT Ricky Heimuli (So.).

Reaction: The two DTs are young, but they are more talented than the Ducks' 2010 DTs. Huff is expected to break through this fall.

UCLA (4): OG Chris Ward (So.), F-Back Anthony Barr (So.), DT Cassius Marsh (So.), SS Dietrich Riley (So.).

Reaction: Going in, I thought UCLA would have a longer list. In fact, it likely will, seeing that there are plenty of undecideds on the depth chart.

California (3): WR Keenan Allen (So.), LB Dave Wilkerson (RFr.), CB Steve Williams (So.).

Reaction: Cal figures to play a lot of young players this fall, but at present it doesn't look like many will start.

Oregon State (3): OG Josh Andrews (So.), DE Scott Critchton (RFr.), OLB Michael Doctor (So).

Reaction: This low number shouldn't be surprising. Coach Mike Riley's system for success is development. He recruits guys who aren't there yet but get there after a few years in the program.

Originally posted by ESPN.com - Pac-10 Blog
Click here to view the article.
 
Back
Top