1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Zone read vs Smash Mouth

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by BuffUp, Nov 8, 2013.

  1. BuffUp

    BuffUp W.T.T.F. Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    954
    I like the zone read, it hides deficiencies, is exciting, but after watching that game last night - man I love that boring dominating smash mouth football. :thumbsup: PHYSICAL PLAY :thumbsup:. Man that was humbling, huh Oregon?? Discuss -
     
  2. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    56,882
    Likes Received:
    4,911
    did you like it when Stanford ran smash mouth zone read?
     
  3. BuffUp

    BuffUp W.T.T.F. Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    954
    even better
     
  4. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    17,236
    Likes Received:
    1,795
    Hey I remember this thread a couple years ago when we were justifying Embrees "offense"
     
  5. Shldr2Shldr

    Shldr2Shldr Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2011
    Messages:
    16,815
    Likes Received:
    4,986
    Loved the 9OL set. Oregon knew what was coming, and they could do nothing about it.
     
    Wyo Buff likes this.
  6. BuffUp

    BuffUp W.T.T.F. Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    954
    someone should go over and spy on the oregon forum... are they in melt down mode now??
     
  7. Walter White

    Walter White Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    19
    Stanford only scored 26 points. If Stanford's D wasn't so good people would be calling Stanford's smash mouth offense inept.
     
  8. Walter White

    Walter White Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    19
    Washington State scored 38 on Oregon. Some in junk time, but still...
     
  9. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,597
    Likes Received:
    4,565
    If Stanford didn't play complementary football, no one would call them a good football team.
     
  10. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    56,882
    Likes Received:
    4,911
    :nod: last night was a masterpiece of a gameplan (not to mention execution). Outside of a few players, Oregon had far more talent at most positions. And they got blasted.
     
  11. SuperiorBuff

    SuperiorBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    12,735
    Likes Received:
    1,112
    The difference between Stanford and Oregon is a commitment to physicality as a team. Smash mouth is an attitude as much as a style of play.
     
  12. Walter White

    Walter White Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    19
    I think scoring a lot of points on offense tends to align nicely with not giving up many points on defense. ...complementary, if you will.
     
  13. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,597
    Likes Received:
    4,565
    Yep. Anyone calling Stanford's offense inept for last night's performance needs to start watching games more closely. It goes the other way too. It is clear that Oregon's coaching staff really struggles to adapt in close games.
     
  14. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,597
    Likes Received:
    4,565
    I bet you also think Gaffney had a poor game averaging less than four yards per carry.
     
  15. Walter White

    Walter White Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    912
    Likes Received:
    19
    I'll bet you think Stanford would have won this game with the same defense the Ducks put on the field.
     
  16. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    48,412
    Likes Received:
    4,433
    Stanford has provided the blueprint for beating Oregon. Not that it's easy, mind you. But just like there was a blueprint for beating those Nub teams in the 80's and 90's, there is now a blueprint for beating Oregon. Having seen that game last night, I came away convinced Alabama would beat Oregon. BTW - I hate that F**king horn that they blow at the Stanford games. Annoying as Hell. Maybe it has to do with the fact that the last time I went to a game there, that damn thing went off about 20 times.
     
  17. BuffClass90

    BuffClass90 Banned BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    3,905
    Likes Received:
    96
    Me too. I was commenting last night to a buddy that you can have all the speed and flashiness, but it's nothing against being "outphysicaled", outcoached and outexecuted. I don't see Oregon winning a NC as long as types like Stanford and Alabama.
     
  18. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,597
    Likes Received:
    4,565
    No. I think Stanford's offensive gameplan was sensational because it relied on ball control to keep Oregon's offense off the field. Nine more first downs and 21 more plays than the opponent is hardly inept. In fact, quite the opposite. It took a blocked FG return and an onside kick recovery for Oregon to even make a game out of it. You seem to believe Stanford's ground game had nothing to do with their defensive success. Strange argument to make.
     
  19. BuffLuKe

    BuffLuKe Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    18,532
    Likes Received:
    1,111
    Some things will never change in football. If you can kick people's ass up front on both sides of the ball, you can pretty much do what u want style wise. That's basically what happened last night.
     
  20. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    56,882
    Likes Received:
    4,911
    At one point, I was wondering what would happen if Jabar got loose for more than 5 yards. I thought it was 50/50 on whether he would just go down once he got the first. Stanford's whole plan was to prevent Oregon from getting in rhythm on offense by playing keep away. Given enough time, Oregon almost always figures out what a defense is cheating on, then eats them up. Stanford didn't give them enough time or reps for them to do that. great stuff.
     
  21. BuffLuKe

    BuffLuKe Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    18,532
    Likes Received:
    1,111
    Skov was freaking everywhere, that folks is a linebacker. Stanford is a little nasty too, they are cocky and good.
     
  22. azbuff

    azbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,667
    Likes Received:
    277
    Question I was wondering watching last night's game. Is Stanford the embodiment of Embo's vision for CU? I think the answer is yes. Obviously it was an epic failure of a try, but I think that kind of offense/defense was what he was aiming for.
     
  23. BuffUp

    BuffUp W.T.T.F. Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    954
    you got it, keeping them off the field is only half the plan if the defense doesn't stop those less then a minute scoring drives. Masterful plan executed to a tee. Jam those receivers off the line so they can't get to speed then get on the QB and get in his face.
     
  24. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    39,597
    Likes Received:
    4,565
    I don't know about that, az. He may have said as much, but his recruiting told a different story. Signing a bunch of short RBs and DEs is not really the Stanford way.
     
  25. azbuff

    azbuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    Messages:
    2,667
    Likes Received:
    277
    You're probably right. It is what I envisioned when Embree talked. Actions were different, although he may have just been getting what he could get.
     
  26. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,906
    Likes Received:
    2,609
    Thank you...you saved me from having to say it. One guy in my office is a huge Oregon fan...I told him Oregon would never get a MNC until they could match the SEC up front. Well, looks like they have to match up with Stanford up front first.
     
  27. buffedup

    buffedup Cooler than a Popsicle Stand. Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    7,546
    Likes Received:
    815
    Yep, FSU or Bama would have gone into the 4th quarter last night leading 40-0. That game ends as a blowout without the blocked FG.
     
  28. SECOBuffsFan

    SECOBuffsFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    37
    They did it for JOHN!!
     
  29. MtnBuff

    MtnBuff Not allowed in Barzil 2 Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    26,397
    Likes Received:
    2,323
    Teams that win championships are usually leaders, not followers.

    In the last few years the trend in college FB has been to go the direction that Oregon is in the forefront of. Focus on speed, spread the field, create one on one matchups that if won result in a fast player having the ball in the open field.

    As this happens defenses adjust by going with smaller, faster defenders who can play in space, who have a better chance of neutralizing those one on one match-ups.

    What Stanford has done is recruited well enough that they can hold up on the back end of the defense but focused on winning physically up front on defense. Don't let the ball get to open space to start with, don't let the OL get to where they can create gaps.

    At the same time on offense they have gone counter to the wide open speed game and built a physical group that would rather run over defenses than try to run by them. Put a bunch of big, physical players out there against defenses that are built to handle speed instead of power and you get a missmatch.

    This by the way is the same thing that Bama has done over the past few years on their way to rolling up NCs. It isn't that they lack speed, they don't. They would just much rather use power to beat teams up to create opportunities for that speed to show rather than focus on beating speed with more speed.

    It is to bad that Stanford lost to Utah because a Cardinal-Tide NC game would have been a great game to see.
     
  30. leftybuff

    leftybuff Iconoclast Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    24,906
    Likes Received:
    2,609
    Oregon is the epitome of pretty boy West Coast flash Football. They are damn good, but will usually lose to a set of nasty old school FB players...especially if they have a good OL and DL.
     

Share This Page