This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Right. I think there’s a decent chance your model might end up “chasing” improvement and results. Not a knock on your model in the least, but more a comment on the strength of this staff, their ability to get the most out of guys, and the roster as constructed.
Colorado trucking Nebraska is a possibility (but infrequent). What you’re not factoring into account is that Colorado’s run defense is suspect. The game is close if Nebraska equals TCU’s ypc output (7.7).
I think this take is 1000% homer.
I'm serious. Why would you think otherwise?
How do models handle players with no prior cfb snaps? Dylan Edwards, for example.
The billboard or sign was painted in the late 1980s...
I think Rhule's **** talking on social media cancels this out. It's personal baby.
I am taking this in to account. I believe they won’t come anywhere close to giving up that many ypc against NU.
I am a homer, but no. This is based on very specific things I know about this team, this staff, and the sport. I guess we’ll see.
Good question. Mine takes into account composite star rating and depth chart placement. Players with zero college statistics are tougher to rate because HS competition is often very poor. The depth chart piece was something we added a few seasons back because composite star ratings didn’t give the full picture of the player’s prospects for playing time. The predictions are now more stable because professional evaluators give us an indicator of that player’s preparedness for college football.
So you're referring to the "Sal is dead" sign some asshole hung from an overpass or somewhere? First of all, IIRC it was a sign, not a billboard. And second, it was in over 30 yrs ago, so it's old news. I thought perhaps some deluded Fusker fan had paid for a billboard recently ... so forgive my confusion, @Tatanka. And stuff it.
As a lifelong fan, I certainly hope Colorado wins handily. As an advantage sports bettor, any line worse than Colorado -2.5 is untouchable for me.
Let’s bet on Nebraska’s YPC. What do you mean by “won’t come anywhere close?”I am taking this in to account. I believe they won’t come anywhere close to giving up that many ypc against NU.
I am a homer, but no. This is based on very specific things I know about this team, this staff, and the sport. I guess we’ll see.
I hate to have to even type this. The infamous “Sal is dead, Go Big Red” sign."
You have seriously thin skin. Chill out, man.
See post #252 above. You could have saved yourself some unnecessary stress.
You're new around here. We have a long history of getting excited about players in the spring!
Then don't be a dick when it's uncalled for
I'm banking on a style difference. Against TCU, the defense had to play "pass first" and couldn't take risks with blitz packages since the Briles system exploits that stuff. Against Nebraska, I think we'll be able to run-blitz the hell out of them, use a spy for zone reads & scrambles, and dare Sims to challenge Travis & Omarion in single coverage.
Either way, he won't play in the first half. We need to finish the game in the first half.You're new around here. We have a long history of getting excited about players in the spring!
Most of us have learned to ignore spring, summer and fall camp.... a lot!
He hasn't come anywhere near being all conference in 3 years of playing.
They averaged 4.9 against a far superior run defense in Minnesota. Nebraska’s rush attack is much better than what Colorado saw against TCU.
Under 5 yds pc
You’ll enjoy this site more if you manage to get a sense of humor and take a little good natured ribbing in the way it was intended like almost everyone else here.
Have a good one.
So I get 5 ypc+? How much?
How do you know Minnesota has a "far superior run defense"?
