If 3 and out is what you want to see out of our O. :huh:
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
KU Thread?
- Thread starter Timbuff10
- Start date
If 3 and out is what you want to see out of our O. :huh:
No, but we did gain 5 yards.
As green as he is, in those three plays he looked infinitely more poised in the pocket than Cody does.
I don't agree completely with that but he did just get a 1st.
Why on 3rd and 20 do you call a play with one receiver deep and max protection. You're losing the game, get 10 yards and then get 10 more. And then, you're down 16 with 4 minutes left and you punt on 4th down? WTF
Anybody who thinks that qb is the source of our problems needs to lay off the Thunderbird a touch.
I am beginning to lose confidence in our Offensive coordinator/quarterbacks coach... :huh:
NYbuffDIEHARD
Active Member
Little Hawk was better last year, I just think like i said earlier he is mired in a sophmore slump. Something needs to snap him out of it.
Timbuff10
Member
I don't think anyone here is saying that... We can't pick up any Oline guys off of the waiver wire but we can change our QB and get someone with the tools the experience to win some games for us.
It isn't the only source of our problems, but it sure as **** isn't a strength... :sad2:
Cody is very skittish in the pocket. Ballenger is obviously green, but he stands in the pocket and keeps his eyes downfield. He's got the presence to step up in the pocket to buy time. Hes got a better arm than Cody and isn't any worse on his feet.
I don't understand how people keep pimping Cody when we have a QB on the bench who AT LEAST has the tools and just needs experience. Experience doesn't mean **** when your QB can't physically make the plays he needs to make.
I hear you, I just think we need wins and IMHO I think Cody still gives us the best shot at that. I absolutely want Ballenger to continue to get snaps in games but I think we lose more with him as the starter.
Hrmmm... Ballenger feels the pressure, steps up, and avoids the pressure, mind you, in the pocket and completes an 18 yard pass down the field to McKnight... something we haven't seen out of a QB all season!
Chandlerbuff
Member
say what you want... Matt can at least see over the middle and make plays! looks alot better in the pocket aswell...
That's fair... I see them as the same thing right now. Because of their plusses and minuses, we've got an equal chance to win right now with Cody and Ballenger. The difference is the Cody is NOT improving, and we don't know what we have in Ballenger. Ballenger has upside, Cody is a known quantity. Just one man's opinion though.
All done against the 2nd and 3rd string KU defense.
I don't think it's a good idea to base a QB decision based on performance in scrub time.
When Ballenger was in early in the 4th he was not any more effective than Cody.
Damm that was ugly. This makes 2 of the last 3 where we beat ourselves. 
I'm on that fence. Just not ready to jump to the Ballenger side....yet.
FlatironsBuff
Well-Known Member
Anyone who does not think that there is a problem with our QB is bogarting the Thunderbird.
Lt.Col.FrankSlade
Well-Known Member
I didn't see Ballenger play against UT but I wasn't overwhelmingly impressed with his performance today.
He has a SLOW delivery.
He has a SLOW delivery.
We would be 5-1 with a QB. MAYBE 6-0 the way our defense stood up against Texas. (Though that's a VERY THIN MAYBE)
manley1104
New Member
Ballenger didn't look that good either, he threw a couple of ducks. Maybe we should have speedy take the snaps.
Slow delivery. Threw a duck. Doesn't look particularly adept at running.
FlatironsBuff
Well-Known Member
You know why it was 18 yards? Because he hit him in stride. i am sick of watching WRs have to come back to the ball with Cody or stop, catch the ball, then start running again.
Count me off the Cody bandwagon. The backup without the experience is as good, and has more upside. Need to play him. Should have played him the last series in the first half, at least.
FlatironsBuff
Well-Known Member
Really, and what do you base that off of? They had Reesing playing, and had Meir (Wr, and backup QB) playing. Had starting O playing. But yet you just throw out that the backups on D were in. I call bull****. You nothing ot the ****ing sort.
Face it. He is as good as Cody is now, with way more upside.