bpc5180
Well-Known Member
Would be the latest in long line of recruits we've already been beaten out for this cycle vs ranked PAC 12/Big 12/SEC schools.
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. It's a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars, and best of all, no ads! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
-
After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936
'18 TX ILB Nicholas Bolton (Verbal to Missouri)
- Thread starter WasianCU
- Start date
Would be the latest in long line of recruits we've already been beaten out for this cycle vs ranked PAC 12/Big 12/SEC schools.
yep
We will be "beaten out" for 90% of the recruits that are in the database with reported offers. Every year. I try not to get too excited about a recruit unless/until he names the Buffs in his Top 5 or fewer (or comes on an OV).
You said you wanted a LB well above 6'0" and in the 240 range. Bolton does not fit that description. Do you view Bolton as much better than Moore?
We've also beaten out multiple P5 programs for every recruit on the current commitment list, so what's your point?
what is he 17? pretty sure he has not filled out. and Moore has potential, but Bolton looks to be a little more physical.
My point is Bolton is 6'0" or just under. At that height, he actually might be close to filled out. He does not fit the type of LB you were talking about. The overall differences between Moore and Bolton are pretty small, neither is elite.
SerenityBuff
Well-Known Member
We need LBs in the worst way. He'd be a solid get.
I celebrate the guys entire catalog.
Bufffan68
Well-Known Member
sonics1993
Well-Known Member
UW backed off. Peterson called him the other night and let him know that they were pulling his scholarship after they found out he was talking to Texas a&m.
Hi.O
Well-Known Member
But aside from that, were they cooling on him already?
I'm pretty sure that was always Petersen's policy at Boise. If a guy wanted to look, he wasn't considered committed. Petersen would still take him later, but would be recruiting others for the spot and the scholarship would go to the guy who fully committed first. Always seemed like a fair approach to me.
sonics1993
Well-Known Member
Your correct with that policy. This situation is unique in that they told Bolton that they were now going in anthor direction. UW is in it for some highly rated LB that are committed to other schools. This tells me that they feel good about there chances to land one or two of them.
BehindEnemyLines
beware the habu
Agreed. Too bad he picked black and yellow instead of Black-n-Gold.
Sykobuff
Well-Known Member
DrunkRalphie
Well-Known Member
Better Mizzou than a Pac school.
BehindEnemyLines
beware the habu
The color consultants at CU should be slapped silly.
You'll get no argument from me.
What is up with the gold on the helmets, why did it ever change? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.