What's new
By:
  • After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936
  • Submit a March Madness tourney bracket in the Allbuffs group and take home a $50 dollar gift card if you win. This is open to club members only. Details are here

Signed to CU '26 TNFR WR DeAndre Moore Jr.

WasianCU

WasianCU

Club Member
Club Member
Moderator
247 link
ESPN link
hudl link
On3 link
Texas Bio

H35dN_st_400x400.jpg

University of Texas / St. John Bosco HS (Bellflower, CA)

Eligibility: 3 years to play 2

Twitter Link
Instagram Link

Ht: 6'0"
Wt: 192
40:

Transfer ratings:
247s rating: 4* - 95 grade; #3 WR (#10 overall)
ESPN rating:
On3 rating: 4* - 94 grade; #5 WR (#29 overall)

Reported Offers:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

As a '23 recruit:

247s rating: 4* - 94 grade; #19 WR (#121 overall)
ESPN rating: 4* - 85 grade; #13 WR (#75 overall)
On3 rating: 4* - 94 grade; #21 WR (#110 overall)

247sports Composite: 4* / 0.9498 rating / #20 WR / #105 overall

Reported Offers: Alabama, Arizona, Arizona St, Auburn, Florida, Florida St, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisville, LSU, Miami (FL), Michigan St, Notre Dame, Ole Miss, Oregon, Penn St, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M, USC, West Virginia
 
I have seen this trending. He would be a huge pickup, we need one more stud receiver and I think that he plays outside. I think he is bigger than 6' 197, and/or he plays much bigger.

For OT, I saw us trending a few days ago for Leon Bell (Cal) but that was before we landed Hughley. He may be in the mix, or maybe they spend on an IOL or two. There look to be good guys available at both positions.

Let's plow forward...
 
Last edited:
Bread said:
I feel like this argument can’t be used when we’ve brought in 20 offensive and defensive lineman (including edge) thus far and I’m sure they are targeting a few more…
Click to expand...
I hear you, I'm just not very impressed with the majority of those players.
 
cnbuff410 said:
So you are not impressed by P2 leftovers, and great g5/fcs production.

I'm curious what do you actually want when it comes to portal?
Click to expand...
What I want depends on who we want to be be. Are we still going to attempt to make that jump to playoff contention level ("Louis level") or has Sanders changed his vision and we're now just trying to get to 6-8 wins and a bowl game regularly. Are we Minnesota or are we Indiana?
 
Da Lama said:
What I want depends on who we want to be be. Are we still going to attempt to make that jump to playoff contention level ("Louis level") or has Sanders changed his vision and we're now just trying to get to 6-8 wins and a bowl game regularly. Are we Minnesota or are we Indiana?
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, we don’t have a Mark Cuban, who can just give 20-30 million every single year not only to bring in players but retain the guys already on the roster
 
Da Lama said:
What I want depends on who we want to be be. Are we still going to attempt to make that jump to playoff contention level ("Louis level") or has Sanders changed his vision and we're now just trying to get to 6-8 wins and a bowl game regularly. Are we Minnesota or are we Indiana?
Click to expand...
Colorado's goal next year will be 6-7 wins. Anything beyond that is just wishful thinking.

We should stop using Indiana as a reference. They are unicorn. 135 out of 136 FBS teams envy what Indiana has achieved. That's not a norm. That's a miracle.
 
Formerly_Medford said:
Unfortunately, we don’t have a Mark Cuban, who can just give 20-30 million every single year not only to bring in players but retain the guys already on the roster
Click to expand...
We don’t, but that’s not the reason they’re good. Yet. He didn’t start injecting money into their athletic department until last offseason. And even then, word is it paled in comparison to what programs like Georgia, Texas, Texas Tech were getting (are still getting).

Indiana got good because they struck gold with Curt Cignetti. That’s the only reason.
 
Da Lama said:
What I want depends on who we want to be be. Are we still going to attempt to make that jump to playoff contention level ("Louis level") or has Sanders changed his vision and we're now just trying to get to 6-8 wins and a bowl game regularly. Are we Minnesota or are we Indiana?
Click to expand...
I have preached for years that it needs to be both.

Fundamental investment in having a first class infrastructure where any good coach in any sport should always have a winning season with an occasional breakout year at CU. And a great coach in any sport would be able to go on a national prominence run.

My feeling about CU for all the time I've been a fan is that it's lacked the will or commitment to be that but has still had that expectation for success. That we blame the coach and think we can do things the same way, only needing some messiah, miracle worker of a coach to solve everything.

If CU sets the baseline, the donor base and great coaches follow.
 
1991 Orange Bowl said:
We don’t, but that’s not the reason they’re good. Yet. He didn’t start injecting money into their athletic department until last offseason. And even then, word is it paled in comparison to what programs like Georgia, Texas, Texas Tech were getting (are still getting).

Indiana got good because they struck gold with Curt Cignetti. That’s the only reason.
Click to expand...
They have a $30 million roster this year, but a large portion of that was to retain players.

This year, they’re getting higher rated guys in the portal because they have more money to spend on acquisitions
 
Formerly_Medford said:
They have a $30 million roster this year, but a large portion of that was to retain players.

This year, they’re getting higher rated guys in the portal because they have more money to spend on acquisitions
Click to expand...
And they're winning. And their players are getting good coaching.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top