Responses fell out the way I would have expected. Quotes are really worth reading. I agree that there's a lot of head scratching about how NET is used for selection but not for seeding, how the conference performance and momentum aren't emphasized enough, and how mid-majors either get over-seeded or screwed over with the way things are done.
| COACH | VOTES |
|---|---|
| Mid-major discrimination | 32% |
| Lack of consistency year-over-year/a clearer message on priority of criteria | 17% |
| Performance in league play should carry more weight | 17% |
| No issues/gripes | 10% |
| Use of the NET | 8% |
| More transparency from selection committee | 5% |
| Seeding protocol | 5% |