Real name isn't Nik
Responses fell out the way I would have expected. Quotes are really worth reading. I agree that there's a lot of head scratching about how NET is used for selection but not for seeding, how the conference performance and momentum aren't emphasized enough, and how mid-majors either get over-seeded or screwed over with the way things are done.
|Lack of consistency year-over-year/a clearer message on priority of criteria||17%|
|Performance in league play should carry more weight||17%|
|Use of the NET||8%|
|More transparency from selection committee||5%|