1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. The admins are aware of site instability throughout the day today. We have our crack technical staff checking it out, but it is probably the Russians. If you are having any specific issues, please post them to the Customer Service Support Forums and we will get to them in the next 24 to 48 weeks. Thank You

Indiana/Michigan

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by JimmyBuff, Sep 26, 2009.

  1. JimmyBuff

    JimmyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,901
    Likes Received:
    227
    My God, Indiana is even 3-0... Just goes to show how Pathetic Talkins really is..


    17-14 up on Michigan.. Not much defense in this game.
     
  2. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,773
    Likes Received:
    557
    But come one, 2 of their 3 wins came against MAC teams. Oh wait, never mind. :smile2:
     
  3. aik

    aik Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,911
    Likes Received:
    650
    IU's missed a lot of chances in this game and they're still ahead. Michigan is reverting to futility.
     
  4. aik

    aik Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,911
    Likes Received:
    650
    And that's what happens when you let them hang around.
     
  5. CUBUFF80

    CUBUFF80 No Stinkin' Title Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    12,041
    Likes Received:
    881
    IU got jobbed, NCAA officials are so utterly clueless.
     
  6. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,773
    Likes Received:
    557
    That definitely looked like dual possession and therefore should have been IU's ball.
     
  7. aik

    aik Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    5,911
    Likes Received:
    650
    It should have gone IU's way but the ruling on the field will typically get the benefit of the doubt. The Hoosiers often traded 7 points for 3 and 3 points for 0 with a lot of execution mistakes. Should have gone for the kill shot on Michigan earlier and the call wouldn't have decided the game.
     
  8. Dunken

    Dunken Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    5
    BAD CALL....real bad call....but hey Mich won so they will move up in the polls
     
  9. Mick Ronson

    Mick Ronson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    9,893
    Likes Received:
    279
    IU got hosed.
     
  10. zbuff

    zbuff Juiceful and useful. Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,527
    Likes Received:
    749
    Yeah, and to make matters worse - it's not reviewable? You have to be kidding me! A change of possession play not reviewable? That needs to be changed.
     
  11. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,773
    Likes Received:
    557
    They reviewed it.
     
  12. zbuff

    zbuff Juiceful and useful. Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,527
    Likes Received:
    749
    Not according to the announcer, who said it was not reviewable.
     
  13. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,773
    Likes Received:
    557
    Then why did they take about 5 minutes to review it? :confused:
     
  14. zbuff

    zbuff Juiceful and useful. Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,527
    Likes Received:
    749
    I don't know - I thought they got ripped, heard the announcer say that, and changed the channel.
     
  15. L Buff

    L Buff Commissar of the Albuffs Collective Left Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,238
    Likes Received:
    1,443
    Didn't see the game ... just saw it briefly on ESPN highlights. But a dual possession possibility is defintely reviewable. If you recall in 2007 we won one in the OU game that was pivotal in our glorious upset of the Sooners ... we got the interception on a key series in the 4th quarter. :thumbsup:
     

Share This Page