What's new
By:
  • After multiple requests and discussion, Twitter/X links will again be allowed on the board. Be mindful of the content you choose to post. Inflammatory, misinformation, or any content that violates the ToS will be removed. Repeated offenses may result in temporary suspensions. If you would like to still have Twitter/X links hidden from your feed, send a PM to Bread. Any other questions can be discussed in the customer service/support forum. Examples of hide tweet options shown here: https://allbuffs.com/threads/twitter-x-ban.161161/post-3915936
  • Submit a March Madness tourney bracket in the Allbuffs group and take home a $50 dollar gift card if you win. This is open to club members only. Details are here

Other games weekend of 10/13-10/15

That was a joke how they ended the CSU game.
****ty officiating there. Maybe only a 1% chance that CSU converts the Hail Mary or Stanford Band Play from the 40, but they got "screwed" there.
FWIW, a CSU victory over Boise would have pumped CU up in the computer rankings a bit.
 
jkppkjjkp said:
That was a joke how they ended the CSU game.
****ty officiating there. Maybe only a 1% chance that CSU converts the Hail Mary or Stanford Band Play from the 40, but they got "screwed" there.
FWIW, a CSU victory over Boise would have pumped CU up in the computer rankings a bit.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Boise losing probably would have seen us leapfrog them. They should drop a couple spots even for this. Not impressed. Nick Stevens threw for 171 yards, probably a career high.
 
Buffnik said:
Wazzu just gave us a lot of help in the South standings.
Click to expand...

I'm assuming that USC gets thumped at Washington, as will ASU, Utah could very easily lose two of their next 3 (at UCLA, Wash, atASU).

I think we either win the South with 1 or 2 losses, or we lose the tiebreaker to USC with 3 losses (holding out some hope for a weird 3-way tiebreaker that goes our way in that case too)

I think the Stanford game is our toughest one left.
 
jkppkjjkp said:
I'm assuming that USC gets thumped at Washington, as will ASU, Utah could very easily lose two of their next 3 (at UCLA, Wash, atASU).

I think we either win the South with 1 or 2 losses, or we lose the tiebreaker to USC with 3 losses (holding out some hope for a weird 3-way tiebreaker that goes our way in that case too)

I think the Stanford game is our toughest one left.
Click to expand...

Trying not to think too far ahead. I want to beat Stanford so bad.
 
CVilleBuff said:
Yeah, Boise losing probably would have seen us leapfrog them. They should drop a couple spots even for this. Not impressed. Nick Stevens threw for 171 yards, probably a career high.
Click to expand...

I think they stay steady in the Coaches poll, which always values wins more than the AP.

Arkansas will jump them, maybe Florida would, but Boise should be ahead of a 3 loss Ole Miss now. Maybe West Virginia jumps them. I wonder how far Tennessee falls?
 
Buffnik said:
Trying not to think too far ahead. I want to beat Stanford so bad.
Click to expand...
Yeah me too (on the beat Stanford part). I can't help but look all the way ahead, it's been so long since a bowl game, let alone a conference championship game has been a realistic possibility.

I'm afraid of the lines getting pushed around like they did against USC.
 
jkppkjjkp said:
I think they stay steady in the Coaches poll, which always values wins more than the AP.

Arkansas will jump them, maybe Florida would, but Boise should be ahead of a 3 loss Ole Miss now. Maybe West Virginia jumps them. I wonder how far Tennessee falls?
Click to expand...

Rule of thumb: despite playing only 8 conference games, voters treat every SEC team as if it has 1 fewer losses than it does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBG
jkppkjjkp said:
That was a joke how they ended the CSU game.
****ty officiating there. Maybe only a 1% chance that CSU converts the Hail Mary or Stanford Band Play from the 40, but they got "screwed" there.
FWIW, a CSU victory over Boise would have pumped CU up in the computer rankings a bit.
Click to expand...

No doubt.

I don't know how you can go from, oh, we accidentally rolled the clock to put the time back on and move the up five yards to the game is over. Especially off of the same replay angles.
 
At the same time, if the one kid had just gone out of bounds instead of trying a lateral that was literally going to go nowhere, they still would had the chance.
 
I don't know how serious his shoulder is, but he tried to get warm for this game before they scratched him. Kinda tells me he'll be ready by the time they get here.
 
Burrito Palazzo said:
It's weird to see the pirate with a good running game.
Click to expand...
he actually had a couple good rb's at Tech. speaking of....Kliff K has the biggest free pass around. Tech is always slightly better than average....and he has expensive watches and people act like he's really great. i'd be getting tired of pretending Kliff's Tech is good if i was a red raider fan. they do get also average OU and former Kliff boyband member Baker Mayfield....next week in lub tex. i was in Norman last week and the papers are full of how thin OU is on D. could be a real track meet. 55-52 affair.

in other Big XII musings.....i bet the urinals were an interesting place to be when Texas was half-time down 6-3 at DKR to ISU.
 
oh, man, my whole Kliff thing.....i remember Tech playing pretty bad at Folsom when he was the QB. that was maybe 2002ish. i remember thinking his deep ball was flat, slow delivery....after all the hype coming in. easy win for the Barney era Buffs.

stats: KK with 3 INTs. 60+ return yards for Medford Moorer. Buffs win 37-13. 153 for Chris Brown, Wes Welker with 3 catches.

http://www.cubuffs.com/news/2002/10/26/35119.aspx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top