1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. The admins are aware of site instability throughout the day today. We have our crack technical staff checking it out, but it is probably the Russians. If you are having any specific issues, please post them to the Customer Service Support Forums and we will get to them in the next 24 to 48 weeks. Thank You

Washington AD: Thoughts on Divisional alignment and Revenue Sharing

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by superdeluxe, Sep 29, 2010.

  1. superdeluxe

    superdeluxe New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thought you guys might want to read about it:

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/huskyfootballblog/2013026698__scott_woodward_everyitg_is.html

     
    InTheBuff likes this.
  2. CUFan

    CUFan Welcome back Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Messages:
    7,024
    Likes Received:
    504
    Seems pretty positive to me from a CU perspective.
     
  3. InTheBuff

    InTheBuff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    11,301
    Likes Received:
    530
    excellent information- I like it if it happens
     
  4. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,774
    Likes Received:
    557
    The biggest problem with this whole divisional debate is that the NCAA has this rule which says that a 12-team conference has to be divided into 2 divisions if they want to have a championship game (at least that's my understanding). I just don't get that rule. Why can't you have a 12-team league without divisions but still have a championship game? Because I don't think there's a need to have 2 divisions if it wasn't mandated, that way the 2 best teams in the conference would be in the championship game, which is how it should be.
     

Share This Page