Ralphandler1
Member
I think another more interesting thing to think about, compared to randomly looking at coaching candidates, is to think about what kind of scheme we want to build. What kind of offense would be best to set up in the PAC 10? A power running game? fun and gun? etc. Or should we set up like Auburn and have a big powerful D with a very conservative offense?
Along these lines I have to say I am intrigued by possibly bringing back the option/power running game. For this to happen we would most likely need to bring in Mac or Calhoun. Mac maybe too old (but I still would love to see him on the sidelines again).... and I am not totally sold on Calhoun..... but if we hired him CU would probably be running the triple option again. I am not sure any team in the Pac 10 would have any clue how to defend a power option game. They are not built to stop it at all, they are all built to play fun and gun games. I think having a power running/option game would be very hard for most PAC 10 teams to defend. I think we could have some great success with this.
That said I am just curious everyone's thoughts on what schemes to set up and what coach could set that scheme up effectively.
Along these lines I have to say I am intrigued by possibly bringing back the option/power running game. For this to happen we would most likely need to bring in Mac or Calhoun. Mac maybe too old (but I still would love to see him on the sidelines again).... and I am not totally sold on Calhoun..... but if we hired him CU would probably be running the triple option again. I am not sure any team in the Pac 10 would have any clue how to defend a power option game. They are not built to stop it at all, they are all built to play fun and gun games. I think having a power running/option game would be very hard for most PAC 10 teams to defend. I think we could have some great success with this.
That said I am just curious everyone's thoughts on what schemes to set up and what coach could set that scheme up effectively.