What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

OSU or Alabama for NC against LSU?

OSU or Alabama


  • Total voters
    124
What happened to your A game? This and many of your posts to follow are based on the past. The only thing that matters is this year.



I guess you didn't see the ESPN nationwide map on which only Alabama wanted to see the repeat game.



Oh, yeah, the same guys that voted BYU #1 after beating a 6-5 Michigan team way back when. I don't blame you for bias, but this situation is pretty ****ed up for OSU. According to those voters you love, OSU played a tougher schedule.

Alabama getting in this year is about the same as Boise state getting in on an undefeated year. Bama played a Boise schedule
 
Yes, the Coaches poll is filled out by the coaches, NOT their SID's, and of course, NOT without any bias at all. Just see CJE's latest ballot. These are all true statements. :rofl:

AND Window licker, your flexibility when it comes to your arguments is fascinating. I do like how we've beat you down to the point that you have completely abandoned any mention of on field results and facts in general, and instead have now exclusively based your argument on the human polls. Nicely done.

There are no facts that say OSU is better than UA. There are no facts that say UA is better than OSU. In fact there are no facts they say OSU is better than Ole Miss or that Alabama is better than Kanasas. It is all opinion. You people are harder to deal with than barners.

Show me one goddmaned fact that shows OSU is better than Alabama.
 
There are no facts that say OSU is better than UA. There are no facts that say UA is better than OSU. In fact there are no facts they say OSU is better than Ole Miss or that Alabama is better than Kanasas. It is all opinion. You people are harder to deal with than barners.

Show me one goddmaned fact that shows OSU is better than Alabama.

The facts why OSU should be in over Bama are spewed all over this thread and far outnumber your pathetic biased posts. You are like a fusker with your thick head.
 
There are no facts that say OSU is better than UA. There are no facts that say UA is better than OSU. In fact there are no facts they say OSU is better than Ole Miss or that Alabama is better than Kanasas. It is all opinion. You people are harder to deal with than barners.

Show me one goddmaned fact that shows OSU is better than Alabama.
Stop changing the subject Window licker. And if you will just look above, I believe there are plenty of facts listed that infer OSU is better than bama. And before you go all window licky about my use of the word "infer," please note that unless the two teams have played, all you can do is use facts to infer that OSU is better than Bama, or vice versa.

However, we do know that LSU is better than Bama. FACT.
 
Stop changing the subject Window licker. And if you will just look above, I believe there are plenty of facts listed that infer OSU is better than bama. And before you go all window licky about my use of the word "infer," please note that unless the two teams have played, all you can do is use facts to infer that OSU is better than Bama, or vice versa.

However, we do know that LSU is better than Bama. FACT.

How can you infer the result of an imaginary game without a bias?
 
There are no facts that say OSU is better than UA. There are no facts that say UA is better than OSU. In fact there are no facts they say OSU is better than Ole Miss or that Alabama is better than Kanasas. It is all opinion. You people are harder to deal with than barners.

Show me one goddmaned fact that shows OSU is better than Alabama.

There is no fact that OSU is better than Alabama. The only thing we know for certain is that LSU is better than Alabama even when Alabama is at home.

Alabama has an extra week to rest up and game plan for LSU. OSU actually played and won impressively over a top 10 team while Alabama was at home watching Springer.

I have said nothing in this post besides facts. The facts that I have posted favor OSU playing in the championship game over Alabama.

Maybe OSU should have to play Alabama first and win before they get the "right to play LSU." That's not gonna happen so im my opinion and according to the facts I laid out, LSU should play OSU in the championship game.

This is all moot because Alabama is playing for the championship. Congrats that your team is in but it doesn't make those of us that don't like it stupid or haters. We have a different opinion that yours with a hell of a lot less bias.
 
Last edited:
How can you infer the result of an imaginary game without a bias?

Another attempt to change the subject. You are a wily one, Mr. Window Licker.

And we can do what you ask, as limited as we are by the current system, by using facts. You know, those things that are against you so you keep pretending they don't exist. Please deal with the facts we have presented to you in order to advance the argument, or should we just consider that you have conceded the majority of the facts do not favor your opinion?

Edit: Here is a good example of this, Mr. Licker (you are only a window licker when it comes to discussing Bama, chucky). Note that this guy has no bias at all, and even he thinks Bama should be happy to call it a wash.
Now for that other thing. I did rank Oklahoma State No. 2, because the structure of the poll mandates that there must be a No. 2, but my default position remains that Oklahoma State and Alabama are 2a and 2b. Oklahoma State has a better set of wins — three vs. ranked teams to Alabama's two, seven vs. winning teams to Alabama's three — but the Crimson Tide have been more dominant against a perfectly respectable slate and didn't lose to a 6-6 team.
Alabama's case is not furthered by S-E-C chest thumping because a) The Big 12 easily matched or exceeded the SEC for quality depth, and b) Alabama didn't face either of the best teams in the SEC's East Division, Georgia andSouth Carolina. Oklahoma State endured a nine-game, round-robin conference schedule that did not include any weeks off to casually feast on Georgia Southern, and survived the grind to win the conference title outright. Alabama didn't win its own division. Under the circumstances, I would think the Crimson Tide would be satisfied to call it a wash.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footba...-is-No-1-The-rest-is-noise-?urn=ncaaf-wp11151
 
Last edited:
I think Bama Chuck has been drinking the Anaconda Malt Liquor.

3236488680_0653173006.jpg
 
There is no fact that OSU is better than Alabama. The only thing we know for certain is that LSU is better than Alabama even when Alabama is at home.

Alabama has an extra week to rest up and game plan for LSU. OSU actually played and won impressively over a top 10 team while Alabama was at home watching Springer.

I have said nothing in this post besides facts. The facts that I have posted favor OSU playing in the championship game over Alabama.

Maybe OSU should have to play Alabama first and win before they get the "right to play LSU." That's not gonna happen so im my opinion and according to the facts I laid out, LSU should play OSU in the championship game.

This is all moot because Alabama is playing for the championship. Congrats that your team is in but it doesn't make those of us that don't like it stupid or haters. We have a different opinion that yours with a hell of a lot less bias.

LSU had an bye week also. OSU sat at home and watched UA play one week-they played a scheduled game-not a CCG.

When everybody that matters agrees with me maybe you have the bias.
 
LSU had an bye week also. OSU sat at home and watched UA play one week-they played a scheduled game-not a CCG.

When everybody that matters agrees with me maybe you have the bias.
:lol: I LOVE that this is what your argument has degenerated to.
 
i think bama is better than osu, i just don't think people from alabama should have any reason to feel good about themselves.
 
Alabama getting in this year is about the same as Boise state getting in on an undefeated year. Bama played a Boise schedule

You don't mind exaggeration to make your point do you? 23rd ranked schedule is not our norm but it is nowhere near Boise level easy (which btw is 69).
 
LSU had an bye week also. OSU sat at home and watched UA play one week-they played a scheduled game-not a CCG.

When everybody that matters agrees with me maybe you have the bias.

Now I know you are nothing but a troll. Everyone that matters knows that I verbally destroyed you in this thread.

You will never hear any other point of view. You are just trolling now.
 
:lol: I LOVE that this is what your argument has degenerated to.

Most everybody that knows football in the rest of the world agrees with me. People in opelika, stillwater, and arvada agree with you. That is my only point. It must be hard for you people to digest.
 

I've heard your point of view. I disagree and I've shown FACTS in my disagreement. You have done nothing of the sort. You are a troll plain and simple. Emphasis on simple.


Have fun in this thread boys. Maybe i can deal with Bama Charlie in a few months.
 
Most everybody that knows football in the rest of the world agrees with me. People in opelika, stillwater, and arvada agree with you. That is my only point. It must be hard for you people to digest.

If we go back a bit, this is not your point. This is your latest point. And it is a ****** one that you are claiming is proven by the coaches poll and the Harris poll, I believe. Both of which are filled with bias, lack of information, and are heavily influenced by prior years. So your point kinda sucks. And it is your only point.

Here, let me help you mr. Licker. Your best point is that ISU beat OSU. You should be hammering that. But you are outnumbered in the fact department, so you have avoided it to go with using the human polls as the SOLE REASON why you are "right."
And, do you remember when you were crowing about the computer polls being on your side and said this?

Ranking of teams by humans is biased so please do not use rankings in your analysis.

So please, STFU, sit down, and stick to licking windows.
 
Now I know you are nothing but a troll.

You people are idiots-it has been so long since you have seen good football you don't know it when it slaps your face.

That is a troll and I can troll with the best of them (some people call it a troll but I have always called it a stir). I am trying to have a decent internet conversation with old friends but some of you are so angry, butthurt, bias, tired of/against the SEC you have no objectivity.

You do understand the football world put Alabama in the game-why can't you admit there is a chance you are the one with bias?
 
There are no facts that say OSU is better than UA. There are no facts that say UA is better than OSU. In fact there are no facts they say OSU is better than Ole Miss or that Alabama is better than Kanasas. It is all opinion. You people are harder to deal with than barners.

Show me one goddmaned fact that shows OSU is better than Alabama.

We've been over this, Chuckles. The FACT we have is that LSU is better than Bama. So what's the point of those two playing again? What we don't know is if LSU is better than OSU. Since we also don't know that Bama is better than OSU, and we only have one game left to find anything out, shouldnt' that game be used on finding out if LSU is better than OSU, rather than wasting it on making LSU prove AGAIN that they are better than Bama?
 
If we go back a bit, this is not your point. This is your latest point. And it is a ****** one that you are claiming is proven by the coaches poll and the Harris poll, I believe. Both of which are filled with bias, lack of information, and are heavily influenced by prior years. So your point kinda sucks. And it is your only point.

Here, let me help you mr. Licker. Your best point is that ISU beat OSU. You should be hammering that. But you are outnumbered in the fact department, so you have avoided it to go with using the human polls as the SOLE REASON why you are "right."
And, do you remember when you were crowing about the computer polls being on your side and said this?



So please, STFU, sit down, and stick to licking windows.

That was used because your side said it and then your side wanted to use rankings as a fact.
 
We've been over this, Chuckles. The FACT we have is that LSU is better than Bama. So what's the point of those two playing again? What we don't know is if LSU is better than OSU. Since we also don't know that Bama is better than OSU, and we only have one game left to find anything out, shouldnt' that game be used on finding out if LSU is better than OSU, rather than wasting it on making LSU prove AGAIN that they are better than Bama?

The point of the BCS is to put the top 2 teams in the BCSCG. That was done.
 
You people are idiots-it has been so long since you have seen good football you don't know it when it slaps your face.

That is a troll and I can troll with the best of them (some people call it a troll but I have always called it a stir). I am trying to have a decent internet conversation with old friends but some of you are so angry, butthurt, bias, tired of/against the SEC you have no objectivity.

You do understand the football world put Alabama in the game-why can't you admit there is a chance you are the one with bias?

Which one of us "you people" are you calling out here? I am on the record for acknowledging the BCS system, warts and all, is the mechanism for placing Bama in the BCS title game.

I also express my disappointment that the team Boone Pickens bought doesn't qualify to have their asses kicked by LSU.

What exactly are you after here, chuck? Are we all idiots [sic] who don't recognize good football?

Or can't you appriciate that many of us aren't as eccstatic as you are with the output of the selection process?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point of the BCS is to put the top 2 teams in the BCSCG. That was done.

No matter how many times you robo-post that, it doesn't make it true. :lol: We don't know if Bama is better than OSU. We don't know if OSU is better than Bama. And we're not having a playoff, so we'll never know which one is better. What we do know is that LSU is better than Bama. Making them prove that again is a waste of everybody's time, except for Bama fans who don't give a **** about anything other than hoping they'll get lucky this time, and can then claim that they win the season series 1-1 and lay claim to an "undisputed" championship. Making them prove they are also better than OSU would actually cover some new ground and have the chance to prove who THE best team in CFB is. Playing Bama again does neither. It's a waste.
 
That was used because your side said it and then your side wanted to use rankings as a fact.
So you are no longer in support of this statement because it doesn't support your new argument? Nicely done, Window Licker. Should we rename you Kerry, or Romney?
 
Back
Top