For Year 1 of the rebuild, Huskers are doing just fine. You guys got us in our very first Frost game when we were clearly ironing out kinks. I told everyone here that Colorado would not be that good this year after that game and they didn’t believe me. Lol you guys got all butt hurt when Frost said we beat ourselves. (Look at your record, we definitely beat ourselves) we are now competing with 10th ranked Ohio State on the road, losing by a couple plays 36-31. Everyone here said They were gonna blow us out. Do you guys ever get tired of being wrong? And still sucking in what? Year 5? Under your current staff? In one of the weakest power 5 conferences.
Keep clutching onto that game where you “beat” us. That day is over
You provided us with an official simulation in which you predicted nebraska would win the game.
-You were wrong.
You backed up your simulation with your own prediction that nebraska would beat CU.
-You were wrong.
After CU beat nebraska in Lincoln, you returned to "eat crow" and explained that nebraska was on a better trajectory than CU and would go on to have a worse season than nebraska.
-Currently CU has 5 wins and nebraska has 2.
You claimed that nebraska would perform better in conference play than CU.
-At the moment CU has 2 conference wins and nebraska has one. Keep those fingers crossed for that big Illinois game, I guess?
You can talk about weak conferences (I think every team to which CU lost would beat nebraska, except maybe OSU), and your big moral victory (that was actually a loss by the way) against Ohio State. And you can talk about how now nebraska is a rebuild and point out that Frost is in his first year and McIntyre is in his 6th.
But that's just changing the rules of your predictions. You weren't talking about that stuff before. This is your ever shifting narrative. You never told us you were counting moral victories.
We keep talking about beating nebraska ("clutching onto that game") in September, because that's the day the game was scheduled. I think you're confused about how football works. The winner of the game is based on actual on-field results. It's not based on some hypothetical of whom would win a game on some other day when the game wasn't played. Even if it was, I can safely assume that CU would beat nebraska again.
Don't you have a pick-up football game to join, Uncle Rico? Enjoy your strange rationalizations in which a 2-7 nebraska is somehow undefeated.