What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

CU has rejoined the Big 12 and broken college football - talking out asses continues

Without Clemson, what has the ACC been in FOOTBALL the last decade?

No other sports matter in regards to this situation.

Clemson, FSU, Miami are the only brands that move the needle in that conference in football, and two have them have been mediocre to bad the last decade.

The Big 12 hasn't really got brand names with Texas and OU leaving, but there's several football programs there, with the new additions that have produced better than the ACC.
A Big12 without Texas, OU, A&M, Nubs and Mizzou is not at all like the Big12 we left. Joining a conf led by Okie St and Baylor? No thanks.
 
Definitely. Plus the ACC is a dead man walking. Whether it lasts til 2036 or not, they're gonna be destroyed too.

In some ways, it was best for the Big 12 to be the first to picked off, because they got some decent schools to take the places of the defectors. The Pac-12 isn't going to survive that because of geography, and the ACC refugees might find all the places taken.
The ACC schools that will make it are ones like Louisville, that have money to burn and are willing to do it.
 
So it's better to join a conference with zero marquee programs, because at least we know they won't leave us?
What are the other options? Where is the realistic choice in which we end up connected with ANY marquee program? Or two?

We are at dock watching the buttend of that ship leave the harbor—ironically called…the stern….
 
They could have done a lot worse than grabbing semi perennial playoff threat, Cincy, huge market Houston, "recent national champs" UCF, and bigger brand than you realize BYU.

Fair.

They're not turning their noses up at the MTZ schools though, and would be thrilled with UO and UW.
 
I respectfully don't get the "stability in the big12" argument, if you rewind 12 months, they were having the same sky is falling attitude that the conference was toast. Then they added a couple G5 teams, and now all is well?

But now they're a very solid conference after the B1G/SEC tier. OSU, Baylor and TCU have all been right there in the final week in the CFP conversation in various years and Cincinnati just made the playoff. Iowa State has good success in recent years and BYU is a solid national brand.

And we know it's about football but the Big12 has the last 2 national champions in hoops.
 
This is high stakes poker. Take everything with a mountain of salt.
Animated GIF

Waaayyyy Ahead of you
 
The ACC schools that will make it are ones like Louisville, that have money to burn and are willing to do it.

As of this moment, money to burn has not exactly been Oregon's saving grace. They could be in the Big Ten eventually, but they're being treated like redheaded stepchildren right now.
 
A Big12 without Texas, OU, A&M, Nubs and Mizzou is not at all like the Big12 we left. Joining a conf led by Okie St and Baylor? No thanks.
If you told me that Oregon and Washington were completely committed to sticking with the PAC long term, you might be right, but they seem to want out as bad as we do. A PAC that loses USC, UCLA, Washington, and Oregon is a G5 level conference.
 
What are the other options? Where is the realistic choice in which we end up connected with ANY marquee program? Or two?

We are at dock watching the buttend of that ship leave the harbor—ironically called…the stern….
But now they're a very solid conference after the B1G/SEC tier. OSU, Baylor and TCU have all been right there in the final week in the CFP conversation in various years and Cincinnati just made the playoff. Iowa State has good success in recent years and BYU is a solid national brand.

And we know it's about football but the Big12 has the last 2 national champions in hoops.
Fair enough, but we are excited to join a conference where the three most historically significant football programs are ASU, BYU and CU - none of which are currently in the conference.
 
Fair enough, but we are excited to join a conference where the three most historically significant football programs are ASU, BYU and CU - none of which are currently in the conference.
I understand, and I’m not “excited” about being forced into any of these choices, especially in the high stakes game of musical chairs the asshats at USC/UCLA started for everyone else without warning.

These sorts of decisions should happen with due consideration and not under the gun of someone else’s sociopathy.

I think all the members of the (former) PAC12 should refuse to schedule any future games with either USC or UCLA, as payback for doing this with just a couple hours left before the deadline for financial sanctions for everyone else in the conference.
 
I understand, and I’m not “excited” about being forced into any of these choices, especially in the high stakes game of musical chairs the asshats at USC/UCLA started for everyone else without warning.

These sorts of decisions should happen with due consideration and not under the gun of someone else’s sociopathy.

Yeah don’t think anyone here is thrilled this is even a discussion.

**** you SC. We never even got to beat you, god that hurts lol. I will root for your demise you ****s.
 
I understand, and I’m not “excited” about being forced into any of these choices, especially in the high stakes game of musical chairs the asshats at USC/UCLA started for everyone else without warning.

These sorts of decisions should happen with due consideration and not under the gun of someone else’s sociopathy.

I think all the members of the (former) PAC12 should refuse to schedule any future games with either USC or UCLA, as payback for doing this with just a couple hours left before the deadline for financial sanctions for everyone else in the conference.
USC and UCLA if this actually happens:

I Dont Morgan Freeman GIF


I'm not making anything of the statement coming from CU today-You're committed to the Pac 12 until you have a better option come along.
 
The Big 12 only appears stable because they are adding as many weak and vulnerable schools as possible - who are mostly resigned to the fact that their strength is literally in their numbers - to turn themselves into an unmovable blob. They suck. They’re a construct of your mind. A figment of your imagination.

Here are our options:
-Have balls of steel and parlay this into an SEC invite
-Lock Oregon and Washington into whatever media deal for a revised Pac 12 (+ others?)
-Ransom the Big 10 to add us as a lower tier school (we need incriminating docs)
-Join the Big 12 and end up on ESPN+ for the next 10 years
-Strike a deal with the ACC that doesn’t tear up their existing agreement (because many would be poached by B10 and SEC) but adds to their bottom line
-Go further west and add Beijing University and Tokyo State
 
i dont know what kind of poker tables youve sat on, but were talking a few hundred million and essentially the existence of some businesses who gross 9 figures here. id say thats pretty high stakes.
In objective terms, it is high stakes. Compared to the conferences that matter, the money is pretty mediocre.
 
The Big 12 only appears stable because they are adding as many weak and vulnerable schools as possible - who are mostly resigned to the fact that their strength is literally in their numbers - to turn themselves into an unmovable blob. They suck. They’re a construct of your mind. A figment of your imagination.

Here are our options:
-Have balls of steel and parlay this into an SEC invite
-Lock Oregon and Washington into whatever media deal for a revised Pac 12 (+ others?)
-Ransom the Big 10 to add us as a lower tier school (we need incriminating docs)
-Join the Big 12 and end up on ESPN+ for the next 10 years
-Strike a deal with the ACC that doesn’t tear up their existing agreement (because many would be poached by B10 and SEC) but adds to their bottom line
-Go further west and add Beijing University and Tokyo State
The current Big 12 has 100% of its memberships with far superior football products than the one Colorado offers but somehow they’re not good enough. This is comedy.
 
Back
Top