Someone on SoonerFans mentioned that OSU has called a BOR meeting for this Wednesday.
Here's how that meeting goes: What did Mr Pickens tell us to do? Okay let's do that.
Is that the actual meeting or just the media waiting outside? I have no audio.
Boren: "have had informal conversations w/ P12. Those conversations have been warm, constructive."
Weird, but sexy.
prob not a good thing where he lives.And rumors do abound on Boren's sexual orientation, btw.....
i get the need for collapsing and renaming threads, but it's awfully confusing at times and gets unwieldy imo when they get to be 12 page threads. jmo.
What do you propose then? Open a new thread when the OU regents have made a decision although we already have a thread on the topic?
We´ve talked about an all-in-one thread, but ultimately decided against it as it´d be even more chaotic.
RT @Jake_Trotter: Boren said pods can make superconferences work
RT @Jake_Trotter: Boren says threatening litigation no way to keep a conference together
What do you propose then? Open a new thread when the OU regents have made a decision although we already have a thread on the topic?
We´ve talked about an all-in-one thread, but ultimately decided against it as it´d be even more chaotic.
i think that one could read/post topically in the OU thread without having to rename it....every time there is a new development. it also feels kind of mod heavy....if a poster starts and names a post, it's the poster's content imo. not just fodder to be airbrushed by a mod. we had a few posts a few months ago where mods were editing regular AB'ers posts and not for censor reasons. that's not right. that's not for the fans, by the fans. my post should stay my post....not a place for a mod to come in and comment or this or that. i feel that's true about the subject line, too, unless there's a misspell and/or for some other reason the poster asks a mod to edit.
anyone i like the mods and such...but, for the fans by the fans is egalitarian. mods editing posts is pretty non-egalitarian. that's just what i think.
i get the need for collapsing and renaming threads, but it's awfully confusing at times and gets unwieldy imo when they get to be 12 page threads. jmo.
I think of it as a service to the rest of the board when there´s a new development to let people know with one look. With the edited subject line they quickly see there´s a new development whereas otherwise they don´t and the was (was: ....) line makes it very clear the subject line was edited as there´s a new development.
I see it as a service to notify people of developments more than anything. People who may not have the time to read the full thread or check whata new post says all the time.
Interesting that all posters defending modifications of content are.. moderators. :smile2:
Interesting that we have such wise and awesome moderators. We don't deserve you guys. :goldcup: