Wow. Our defensive line is going to be a problem if we are running a 3-3-5.
Wow. Our defensive line is going to be a problem if we are running a 3-3-5.
Will Pericak playing well isn't a surprise to me. I think DE is going to be a great position for him. Good move by the coaches to figure out that his talents are best used on the defensive side of the line of scrimmage. I'm looking for some good contributions from Pericak this year.
I'm under the impression that Pericak is a DT.
Wow. Our defensive line is going to be a problem if we are running a 3-3-5.
huh?
Wow. Our defensive line is going to be a problem if we are running a 3-3-5.
With our talent and the offenses we play, I think this is a great idea!:thumbsup:6 players (3dl and 3lb) committed to stop the run, safeties can come up and play run support too if need be,... and basically 8 players (3 lb and 5db) to stop the pass either in man-to-man or zone coverage or a zone/man hybrid scheme on pass plays.... additionally the LBs can delay blitz, use stunts to pass rush, speed rush off of either side of the de and also "spy" the qb if he is a scrambler or to keep him from getting outside to buy time....
all this done without having to shuttle players off and on the field, especially when offenses switch formations within their spread offense giving it different looks without substituting. Defense cannot substitue players unless there is an injury to a defensive player, or the offense makes a substitution of players 1st...
CU ran a 4-2-5 under Barnett his last few years (until Hank came back) and it sucked.
3-3-5 sounds like the 4-2-5 all over again.
But since CU hasn't done much DL recruiting over the past several years I guess it is a necessity.
CU ran a 4-2-5 under Barnett his last few years (until Hank came back) and it sucked.
3-3-5 sounds like the 4-2-5 all over again.
But since CU hasn't done much DL recruiting over the past several years I guess it is a necessity.
I keep seeing speedy,lockridge and sumler running in the vids but not scott. He must be focusing on punting. :smile2:
CU ran a 4-2-5 under Barnett his last few years (until Hank came back) and it sucked.
3-3-5 sounds like the 4-2-5 all over again.
But since CU hasn't done much DL recruiting over the past several years I guess it is a necessity.
He is so fast you just can't see him on tape. :thumbsup:
3-3-5 defense alignment was used more and more against teams that use a variation of the "spread" offense last year in....
6 players (3dl and 3lb) committed to stop the run, safeties can come up and play run support too if need be,... and basically 8 players (3 lb and 5db) to stop the pass either in man-to-man or zone coverage or a zone/man hybrid scheme on pass plays.... additionally the LBs can delay blitz, use stunts to pass rush, speed rush off of either side of the de and also "spy" the qb if he is a scrambler or to keep him from getting outside to buy time....
all this done without having to shuttle players off and on the field, especially when offenses switch formations within their spread offense giving it different looks without substituting. Defense cannot substitue players unless there is an injury to a defensive player, or the offense makes a substitution of players 1st...
where are these videos yall speak of
[B said:Lt.Col.FrankSlade[/B];434759]Wow. Our defensive line is going to be a problem if we are running a 3-3-5.
Thanks for the Defense 101, but that wasn't my question. You stated that "Our defensive line is going to be a problem if we are running a 3-3-5."
I was simply wondering why our DL would suck in a 3-3-5 more so than in other alignments?