Thread is two or three years early.Thread is one or two days early
We will see with who actually signs. Cannot say yet
Can we lock this thread til maybe signing day?I give it a B. Solid class, but I think it could have been better after coming off a 10-win season and a (brief) top ten ranking.
Right now stands at #35 on Rivals, #41 on 247, and 6th in the Pac-12 in both, the very definition of average for the Pac.Turned out to be a very strong class and CU isn't even done yet.
Right now stands at #35 on Rivals, #41 on 247, and 6th in the Pac-12 in both, the very definition of average for the Pac.
I refuse to concede long term recruiting supremacy to anyone but USC on that list.Washington, Oregon, UCLA, Stanford and USC are always going to out recruit us. Washington/Stanford gets a bump with their recent success on the football field so who knows how permanent that is. But we will never out recruit the other 3 on a consistent basis, we just need to keep slowly closing the gap, which we have.
Washington, Oregon, UCLA, Stanford and USC are always going to out recruit us. Washington/Stanford gets a bump with their recent success on the football field so who knows how permanent that is. But we will never out recruit the other 3 on a consistent basis, we just need to keep slowly closing the gap, which we have.
Funny on Rivals. We went from 35 yesterday to 40 about an hour ago to 36 now.Right now stands at #35 on Rivals, #41 on 247, and 6th in the Pac-12 in both, the very definition of average for the Pac.
I refuse to concede long term recruiting supremacy to USC on that list.
Well you can refuse to concede all you want, USC is USC and they will always be USC. They play in a big city, in an iconic stadium and they’re one of the most well known colleges in terms of football. I can’t foresee a day where USC just suddenly can’t pull high end recruits anymore.
USC is the one program in the Pac-12 where I'll concede. They will always have a Top 15 recruiting class and often be Top 5. CU can get to a point where it is recruiting at #2 in the conference, though. We've been there in the recent past during the Barnett days before the scandal hit and it's not like CU was winning at the McCartney rate at that point - plus our facilities were antiquated by then.I refuse to concede long term recruiting supremacy to anyone but USC on that list.
C at best!
Zero players in the top 300 nationwide
Zero 5 star players
Zero 4 star players
The top player in the state signed with Oregon (Jackson)
USC, UCLA, Stanford, Oregon, Washington, Washington State and Cal ahead of them in Pac12 recruiting (8th out of 12 teams)
Decent recruiting of under the radar players, but no impact players (4 & 5 star studs). Should be recruiting far better given the amazing facilities MM has been provided.