1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CSU's OL

Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by sliderNcider, Sep 2, 2009.

  1. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    16,729
    Likes Received:
    1,370
    The lammies have a lot of confidence in their offense because statistically their OL is the NCAA's most experienced unit. Too bad they gave up 27 sacks last year. Arguably their best OL Shelley Smith is now 50/50 for the game with an ankle injury.

    Our DL should be able to match up pretty well imo.....
     
  2. Darth Snow

    Darth Snow Hawaiian Buffalo Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2008
    Messages:
    55,051
    Likes Received:
    3,540
    Just like last year, I have high expectations that this is going to be our best game from our Dline...
     
  3. dio

    dio Admin Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    29,131
    Likes Received:
    1,709
    I'm not worried about them. Just because they are all seniors doesn't mean they are any good :lol:

    We had good pressure against them last season.
     
  4. dply

    dply Doble hoja Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    20,316
    Likes Received:
    2,394
    Didn't Shelley Smith cover the Kobe case for ESPN?
     
  5. sliderNcider

    sliderNcider MacLovin Club Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    16,729
    Likes Received:
    1,370
    Although our OL is far less experienced, I think our overall talent far exceeds theirs. Especially with Shelley Smith questionable. Didn't we sack them 5 times last year?
     
  6. Junction

    Junction Moderator Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,534
    Likes Received:
    1,000,004

    Yes. If she's now playing OG, she has apparently lost a lot of weight since then.... :smile2:
     
    BuffNut99 likes this.
  7. SkiTownUSA

    SkiTownUSA Administrator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2008
    Messages:
    7,411
    Likes Received:
    198
    I actually think that their OL will be the strongest part of their game. But without an experienced QB, and the loss of Gartrell and Bell they shouldn't be moving the ball too well. We stomp em.
     
  8. NashBuff

    NashBuff CSU Knob-Slobberer

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,909
    Likes Received:
    57
    If we control CSU's OL with our DL, we should win this game easily. That is the key matchup I am looking at for the CSU-CU game.
     
  9. CarolinaBuff

    CarolinaBuff Weekend Poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2006
    Messages:
    18,180
    Likes Received:
    328
    Which is one of the most dangerous matchups for us because it's their strength against our weakness.
     
  10. GoBuffs08

    GoBuffs08 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,650
    Likes Received:
    522
    However good the lambs O line might be is going to be offset by a crappy QB. As long as our D line plays decent against the run there will be no problems.

    If we can keep them from running it will be a blowout!
     
  11. BuffNut99

    BuffNut99 Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    12,760
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    LOL - beat me to it
     
  12. Rraalph 3000

    Rraalph 3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Messages:
    3,647
    Likes Received:
    76
    I think this will be a good test for our DL, yet one that they shouldn't be able to rise up and succeed...As I recall last year we didn't have too much trouble with this group, we did a solid job slowing up the running game & creating pressure. Throwing in a new QB & new RB (both shaky albeit), also definately helps the case.

    Really, the biggest mismatch should be our OL vs. their DL.
     
  13. Hugegroove

    Hugegroove Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,694
    Likes Received:
    82
    Their OL has played together longer than any other OL currently in Div 1 football. They also are in the top 10 for the number of starts they have played in each game. As much as I hate to admit it, as a unit, they ended up playing well together the second half of last season. If we can get up on them by 3 or more scores, it should alter their game plan considerably.
     
  14. snakeyman

    snakeyman Snake Charmer Club Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    37
    Is that UCLA RB transfer eligible this year for them? Anyway, I agree about their OL v. Buff DL. That is the match up of the game if there is one. If the Buff DL gets consistent pressure, it'll be over early.
     
  15. Duff Man

    Duff Man Moderator Club Member Junta Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,773
    Likes Received:
    3,514
    I think they're pretty good, though Smith being out would change things. Not sold on our defensive line.
     
  16. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,336
    Likes Received:
    3,338
    The nice thing is that even if they do have a good O-Line, our D-Backs should be good enough to cover their receivers pretty well. That will free up the linebackers to stuff the run and put pressure on the QB.
     
  17. 4DemBuffs

    4DemBuffs Most admired poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    21,579
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    is it just me or does it seem like every year, no matter what, there are always one or two CSU WR/TE's that make our defensive backfield look like complete fools?

    for some reason, i expect the same this year. it just seems like its written in stone somewhere. :huh:
     
  18. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,336
    Likes Received:
    3,338
    I remember in 2006 when they ran that infernal WR screen over and over again to Morton & Walker. I thought I was going to kill somebody. That's not even that hard of a play to defend. We lost that game by 4 points and probably gave up over 100 yards on that play alone. :bang:
     
  19. Bill Cody

    Bill Cody Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    53
    This is just 1st game of the year mistakes. One of the down sides of playing CSU in the first game every year. There are always communication issues in the secondary (read mental mistakes) when live bullets start flying.

    It isn't one of their receivers dominating our DB's as much as them running freely when we have a coverage breakdown.

    We do it to them too. It is part of what can make this game so gut wrenching...hoping that we make fewer critical mistakes then them.:sad1:
     
  20. 4DemBuffs

    4DemBuffs Most admired poster Club Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    21,579
    Likes Received:
    1,296
    i could buy that to a point. but, anderson and that damn 21st year senior TE they had the last few years were nothing new. they had tape on them. they knew what to expect. they had played against them several times. it could not have been a suprise to anyone what those guys were capable of.

    that being said, i understand your point and its valid. but damn.....:huh:
     
  21. Bill Cody

    Bill Cody Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    53
    Really depends on what coverage they're running. CU typically hasn't played a lot of Man to man or man under. No matter how good the receiver is, if you are running cover 2 and two DB's think that the other guy is going to pick him up....you're going to have someone wide open. Trust me when I say that it really is a communication issue and nothing else. That being said, Sperry was a specimen....he'll make plays on a 5'9" DB ALL DAY LONG.

    I expect that with the experience that we have in our D backfield this year, these issues should be kept at a minumum.
     
  22. canuck_buff

    canuck_buff Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    2,570
    Likes Received:
    30
    They are what they are! College talent at a mediocre level. there is a reason these players are at CSU! They are the left over ****in talent of recruiting. They are nothing more than the Bologna of meats. To give them more credibility is pathetic. NFL fa guys ? you are kidding me right ? Best dream these ****ers could achieve is Vegas bouncers.
     
  23. Skidmark

    Skidmark Flagship of the 12-Pac Club Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    27,066
    Likes Received:
    5,137
    Andy Rooney, Giraldo Rivera, Gilbert Godfried and Joan Rivers have lots of experience, too.

    But they suck.
     
  24. buffs04

    buffs04 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    2,410
    Likes Received:
    171
    Our DL is an enormous question mark. I will not personally count on them dominating anyone, much less the most experienced OL in the country.

    I really just don't see the reasoning there.

    CU will win games despite our DL, not because of it. Not one of our guys is a proven, experienced player and none of them are so wildly, outrageously talented that they can be reasonably expected to dominate right away.
     
  25. rodrigo

    rodrigo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    45
    The master has spoken.
     
  26. dply

    dply Doble hoja Club Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    20,316
    Likes Received:
    2,394
    buffs04 = buffmania?
     
  27. PurifydatA$$

    PurifydatA$$ Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    299
    Likes Received:
    12
    I think this game will be great practice for our D-Line which will include at least 2 freshmen and I expect we will win this one almost regardless of how the D-Line plays. As has been mentioned, our secondary and LBs are strong enough to cover up for most mistakes by the d-line.

    My expectation is that our SPECIAL TEAMS unit will be the most shaky this first game - it's always hardest to get that group consistent without actual game experience; remember the back-to-back kickoffs returned for TD's last year, it was due mainly to rusty special teams. I'd like to see some strong kick & punt returns from our guys, but more importantly I want good coverage on our punts & kicks to win the field position battle.
     
  28. JimmyBuff

    JimmyBuff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,901
    Likes Received:
    227
    I have to be honest, I thought Fairchild called a really bad game last year for CSU.. I was surprised they didn't stick to the run more because they were pushing us around at times last year.. I think that Johnson kid got only 10 or so carries and almost had 100 yards.. He easily could have had a 150 yard plus game last year against us.. Luckily for us he's not there and I don't know if CSU has a RB of that caliber.

    I agree with Boulder Buff, I'm not sold on our DL either and I'm not as high on our LB's as most around here are.. I need to see some players making plays behind the line of scrimmage before I change my opinion on the front 7.. And I've seen 3 years of Hawk/Collins defenses get considerably worse as the season goes on.. I think there's a lot of questions still on the defense and whether we have the players to compete in the Big 12 up front..


    The secondary has some playmakers provided they get some help up front.. I love our safeties now and I'm expecting big things from them.. :thumbsup:
     
  29. Wyo Buff

    Wyo Buff Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,136
    Likes Received:
    278
    MY NAME IS SUE!!!! HOW DO YOU DO!!! NOW YOU GONNA DIE!!!

    Wait, maybe it should be . . . . MY NAME IS SHELLY!!! JIGGLE MY BELLY!!! NOW YOU GONNA DIE!!!
     
    1 person likes this.
  30. sackman

    sackman Club Member Club Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    47,336
    Likes Received:
    3,338
    Yes, but will they be what we think they are?
     

Share This Page