What sucks even worse is that this opens the possibilty that Hawk goes 5-7 this year, goes to the Jenna Jameson Vibrator bowl, wins, and still gets retained for winning a bowl game despite having a losing season at 6-7. :afraid::scared2::ahhhhh::sad1:issed3:
What sucks even worse is that this opens the possibilty that Hawk goes 5-7 this year, goes to the Jenna Jameson Vibrator bowl, wins, and still gets retained for winning a bowl game despite having a losing season at 6-7. :afraid::scared2::ahhhhh::sad1:issed3:
Hey...that did not warrant a Jenna crack (so to speak). What is the matter with you?
No, Ron Jeremy I think.Who is the chairman in that bowl? Tito Ortiz?
Heh, yeah!
HOWEVER... I hate the 6-6 deal as it is. I just can't go for 5-7 and a bowl. For some teams, that would mean getting four easy non-con wins and ONE real win against conference competition. That would just be ridiculous. But college football is insane anyway so might as well I suppose. Plus, it's hard to fire Hawk if that happens. Bad deal IMO.
Plati had a suggestion that, rather than giving a bid to a team with a losing record, the top teams in the 1-A FCS (old 1-AA) playoffs could be invited to play in a bowl game. I kind of like the idea...
No Bowls....16 game playoff....NOW please...the NCAA is a joke
Yeah, but Plati also thinks you are internet scum...
I totally agree, who is going to watch a 6-6 bowl game? I wouldn't worry, it would take Talkins 2 years to win 6 games.If they are going to give bowl games to teams with losing records I would just as soon have them give bowl games to every single team in the country so we can officially stop pretending that having a terrible 6-6 season and going to the meineke car care bowl and losing is some sort of accomplishment.