Has become?
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
MacIntyre contract approved in 8-0 vote
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
Has become?
We also would have accepted, "stone job?"
Thank you Alex...
But don't you claim to have some information about Mac that you are not willing to share until he is gone? And isn't this "information," or whatever it is, why you don't like Mac?
I neither acknowledge nor deny that.
AllStarBuffs
Member
I wonder how Embree and Hawkins are doing with that CU stepping stone
JoeC
New Member
I think I can post links now (as a newbie)...did anyone else see the Krieger hit-piece in today's Daily Camera? http://www.dailycamera.com/editorials/ci_31071054/editorial-blind-led-blind-at-cu
Someone archive.is this. (I can't at the moment) Don't give it clicks
My criticism of MM has to dowi
My criticism of MM has to do with his leadership, the process by which he acquires, develops and lets go assistants, his modest recruiting chops and his overall on-field performance. I applaud his for 2016. Let's see if the conference performance is sustainable. While 2016 was outstanding, one year of winning does nit make a trend.
Yes, I know some circumstances about how Chiv and Leavitt were hired. I will tell after MM leaves. This is related to my criticism of his leadership and talent acquisition noted above.
My criticism of MM has to do with his leadership, the process by which he acquires, develops and lets go assistants, his modest recruiting chops and his overall on-field performance. I applaud his for 2016. Let's see if the conference performance is sustainable. While 2016 was outstanding, one year of winning does nit make a trend.
Yes, I know some circumstances about how Chiv and Leavitt were hired. I will tell after MM leaves. This is related to my criticism of his leadership and talent acquisition noted above.
There is no recent history to suggest it is a stepping stone job.
Good God, nm.
I changed my mind and don't give me the bs Mac isn't a leader. You don't learn under Parcells and take nothing. If you guys are so badass, put your money were your mouth is.
If the acquisition of leavitt and chev is an issue, why would RG give him this extension and pay raise? Obviously it's hard to put down a coach who just won his division but that is a big issue if RG was really the one who brought in leavitt.
RG pays for results. He helped MM improve with the addition of Chiv and Leavitt. That's what good ADs do.
MM's leadership abilities - and other shortcomings - will keep CU from reaching a consistent elite winning level. He has a low ceiling with terminal success. That's just my opinion based on my observations. They are unlike yours. That's OK. Time will tell.
Fair enough.
Deleted member 807
Guest
Air Force Academy sets market rate at $2.6 million for good PR in wake of their athletic scandals.
Zoomie command wants folks to know they really do take discipline seriously.
Zoomie command wants folks to know they really do take discipline seriously.
Winning the P12S 1/5-6 years seems like a low expectation for many fans here. I may be wrong. Maybe that's what CU fans want.i suspect RG wants more. But, again, maybe not.
Deleted member 807
Guest
^^^
Doesn't choose to recognize the depth of the hole from which CU football had to dig itself out.
That is true. Perhaps it, as well, doesn't recognize USC's recent return to elite status which may or may not be permanent although it appears to be trending in the right direction.
Maybe you have higher expectations for how often CU wins the division, league, top 15, etc.
Maybe you have higher expectations for how often CU wins the division, league, top 15, etc.
Deleted member 807
Guest
Lose by a lot.
Lose by a little
Win by a little
Win by a lot.
CU football has had a sustainability issue. The expectation is to compete for a conference title every year. Those who witnessed the 1990s Buffs teams, including Rick George, don't think that's cray.
How long do you hang on to that before having higher expectations then the best of six teams?
Think it's pretty accurate tbh. An inept game of telephone, the blind leading the blind, with Phil being the blindest and should resign.
Deleted member 807
Guest
Did you stop and think about the reason the progression was posted?
- lose big...
This is the year to see if MacIntyre is merely a turnaround artist or an architect of sustainability. Buff nation needs a bowl victory and to get the USC monkey off the program's back.
Even if the man wins 10 games this year, MacIntyre will still have a sub .500 record at CU and people will take pot shots at him.
I expect him to breech 500 in 2018
Fair. How many conference wins this year? To me, that's what matters.Vegas says 4-5.
That's not a good sustainability" number to me.
8Jah
Well-Known Member
I think MM is a good coach for the Boulder environment, which seems unique in all of football. If they can try and embroil even a guy like MM in a scandal like we had the past few months, imagine how long the coach more accustomed to big programs would last.
That said I think there were a lot of possible causes for our success last year; Leavitt, tons of seniors and some uncharacteristic weakness in the conference. The proof for me will be this year.
That said I think there were a lot of possible causes for our success last year; Leavitt, tons of seniors and some uncharacteristic weakness in the conference. The proof for me will be this year.
MM did the best by far of the last 3 coaches of retaining the roster. Hawk was flippant about who stayed and who left. Embree was actively trying to turnover the roster, fine idea, but hard to do in practice. MM kept everybody together for the most part, and it paid off this year.