Discussion in 'Colorado Football Message Board' started by NashBuff, Dec 3, 2012.
It would save a lot of money in the long run.
24kt Gold Turf! :woot:
I recall seeing photos of CU's new practice turf and it looked very nice. Would be great on TV.
Would make sense too if we are planning to move to more of a spread offense.
No. Love grass. Please keep forever.
Hell no. Keep the grass.
this from someone suggesting that Butch and wife are involved in an orgy with CU administration.
Isn't FieldTurf synethnic grass too?
Maybe he doesn't want turf burn to be a problem.
Perhaps he likes to view rug munching.
Hey man. Don't judge what you don't understand.
Keep the grass
I love the grass. Having been on the turf multiple times, Folsom is one of the best fields in the nation. That being said, turf looks awesome on TV
Win some ****ing games.
I don't care it it's turf, grass or rocks, ffs.
Sell the grass in dime bags; new turf paid for
Field turf would help the "Green" rating of Folsom. That's important to the CU community. It will also save money. That's important to the CU community. I think it will happen.
only do field turf if it is all black.
Either black with gold numbers or gold with black numbers.:thumbsup:
Black with gold #'s then do the same to our uni's. Pac-12 doesnt have rules like the MWC lol
keep the grass forever. that field turf is so gross
Hell no, keep the grass.
compromise, half turf and half grass. adds an innovative new element to the game.
everyone pro-grass probably just got pissed that bb2 is on their side.
I need a numbers guy to verify this, but CU's performance went to dogsh*t almost coincidentally with the switch from turf to grass.
Isn't there a tendency to have more injuries with turf Vs grass? If so, keep the grass.
Keep the grass.
Start using Folsom for more than football games and make the AD some extra $$$
Field turf probably makes the most sense.
Is a actually possible to HAVE more injuries than the Buffs have?
Separate names with a comma.