CU Boulder alum, so that’s positive.
Good financial background, which will be critical, and has great connections to the legislature.
Want to hear his vision before I make a full judgement, but not as splashy as I expected
It will be interesting to see what direction he leads once he has established his power base and personal authority. Not someone who comes in with gravitas or a mandate, so I'd expect more subtle moves for a while. I think the choice for Chancellor will be telling.I will also add that Todd is not a political hire. He doesn't have that type of baggage like Kennedy and even Benson. That should help a lot with building consensus, which is critical at CU
Not sure if your misspelling of his first name is intentional or not. His name is Todd. But maybe you knew that?Welcome to Tom!
I am an academic at heart, so not to the moon on the hire. I’m will to let this play out, I don’t think it’s a bad fit at all, just misses a few areas important to me. CU is such a large organization that probably from the business side of the university he will excel but it doesn’t spark academic or educational excitement. I do believe he is passionate about education and student success (unlike Kennedy) but I definitely want to see the roadmap for making CU enrollees better thinkers and stronger students.
I hope he can find a good complement of academic vigor to fill the Chancellor position. Ideally a powerful voice for the campus community; motivating culture, research and academics.
Just wondering what the University President candidate pool looks like, because as alumni/public we never get much insight to the hiring process. Are there really any strong PhDs chasing these positions anymore, or has the corporate university model taken over? Is the CU Regent structure too much of a bureaucratic web that candidates are overlooked or never apply?
I look at my two Universities, CU and Memphis, both have hired new presidents and after learning about both I can’t lie that i am a bit envious of Memphis’s hire (Dr. Bill Hardgrave).
I got emails from the Board of Regents discussing the process. I wish I saved them and would copy and paste, but on the surface the stated process sounded fine. From memory, it was as follows:Welcome to Tom!
I am an academic at heart, so not to the moon on the hire. I’m will to let this play out, I don’t think it’s a bad fit at all, just misses a few areas important to me. CU is such a large organization that probably from the business side of the university he will excel but it doesn’t spark academic or educational excitement. I do believe he is passionate about education and student success (unlike Kennedy) but I definitely want to see the roadmap for making CU enrollees better thinkers and stronger students.
I hope he can find a good complement of academic vigor to fill the Chancellor position. Ideally a powerful voice for the campus community; motivating culture, research and academics.
Just wondering what the University President candidate pool looks like, because as alumni/public we never get much insight to the hiring process. Are there really any strong PhDs chasing these positions anymore, or has the corporate university model taken over? Is the CU Regent structure too much of a bureaucratic web that candidates are overlooked or never apply?
I look at my two Universities, CU and Memphis, both have hired new presidents and after learning about both I can’t lie that i am a bit envious of Memphis’s hire (Dr. Bill Hardgrave).
I think we should go ahead and press on to Kansas City.Salina is a safe non controversial choice. Unlikely to push major change, but we’ll see.
Actually, if that’s a true story, then I’m kind of encouraged. He not only goes to football games, but requires liquid anesthesia just like the rest of us.Others report he downs a shot of Buffalo Trace with Rick before football games
Rick is safe could be one interpretation.
The fact he supports football is a plus. RG is here through the end of his contract unless they have to terminate for cause. I see this as a positive. PD is the one that needs a pink slip immediatelyOthers report he downs a shot of Buffalo Trace with Rick before football games
Rick is safe could be one interpretation.
Thanks!I got emails from the Board of Regents discussing the process. I wish I saved them and would copy and paste, but on the surface the stated process sounded fine. From memory, it was as follows:
1. They assembled an advisory panel from stakeholders (students, alumni, faculty, admin, BoR, donors, locals, state govt, etc.)
2. They hired a nationally recognized search firm
3. They had lots of interest, whittled to 50 on first run. Of that group, there were more women than men, and I think 15 were people of color etc.
4. Whittled down to five for rigorous interviewing by regents
I guess of that five, Saliman was the choice. I’m sort of surprised it was so quick because the last email I received was fairly recent, certainly within a week.
Process seemed ok, though.
Saliman isn’t a disastrous choice, unlike the last guy.