They're better at it than like half the Pac 12 fanbases.
They are higher than a 10, like I said. I suppose in previous years the at-large bids were 11 and higher, so that line varies year to year.Bubble at larges. Arizona is technically an at large.
Hell of a lot better than being friends with Baylor fans.Oh he married a KjSU alum?
Oh he married a KjSU alum?Its the only fane base that can tell @Goose to 'STFU and take take out the trash.'
CBS/Turner should use CBSSN as like an NFL redzone type channel for the first weekend.I want a small pop-up screen on my smart TV to notify me if any game has an 8 point or less spread with under 5 minutes left (4 points at 2 minutes, 1st half.) I could then click on the small screen and the game would appear. Probably a couple of years down the road.
They're all mad at me. I picked New Mexico to the sweet 16.Hell of a lot better than being friends with Baylor fans.
Cal and Stanford fans struggle to show up to games, much less talk ****. LA sports fans only care about the Lakers. ASU fans are too busy giving each other STDs. OSU/WSU are basically MWC teams (despite the fact that Beaver fans think they're in a power conference protected by law), so **** them.Put the bong down. Screaming “EMAW” and “you can’t farm for ****” is hardly smack talk.
And all of these are better than dipshits yelling “EMAW”Cal and Stanford fans struggle to show up to games, much less talk ****. LA sports fans only care about the Lakers. ASU fans are too busy giving each other STDs. OSU/WSU are basically MWC teams (despite the fact that Beaver fans think they're in a power conference protected by law), so **** them.
That's 7.
You can't **** talk opposing fans who don't show up.And all of these are better than dipshits yelling “EMAW”
And all of these are better than dipshits yelling “EMAW”
Nah, they’re fun to make uncomfortable.We'll probably prefer that to dealing with the baptists and mormons.
More like 20 spots higher. I'm not sure how their NET got so bad with all their good wins (WSU). They had some bad losses the past few weeks and seem to be on a bad trajectory. I'm guessing they get bumped by Drake. I don't expect UA to get too far either.They are 12 spots higher than us. Seems odd.
Nah, they’re fun to make uncomfortable.
Buffs were probably one conference win away from hosting.
If they get their mojo back they have a shot at making it past their future conference foes.
NET | Seed | |
Colorado | 25 | 10 |
Boise St | 26 | 10 |
TX Tech | 27 | 6 |
Florida | 29 | 7 |
Miss St | 31` | 8 |
Nebraska | 33 | 8 |
Nevada | 34 | 10 |
Clemson | 35 | 6 |
Colo St | 36 | 10 |
Utah St | 38 | 8 |
FAU | 39 | 8 |
TCU | 42 | 9 |
WSU | 44 | 7 |
TX A&M | 45 | 9 |
Drake | 47 | 10 |
S Carolina | 51 | 6 |
Northwestern | 53 | 9 |
Virg | 54 | 10 |
Making a mormon uncomfortable isn't hard. Just ask them for directions to the nearest liquor store.Nah, they’re fun to make uncomfortable.
My Apple TV has been giving me close game alerts for years.I want a small pop-up screen on my smart TV to notify me if any game has an 8 point or less spread with under 5 minutes left (4 points at 2 minutes, 1st half.) I could then click on the small screen and the game would appear. Probably a couple of years down the road.
Going to be awfully fun to renew that rivalry starting next year in everything lol
K-State fans like hearing the bolded as much as Nebraska fans like being reminded they have the longest bowl drought in the power conferences right now. They'll change the subject on you so fast it isn't even funny.What, exactly, do they have to talk **** about?
They’ve never won a championship in an NCAA sanctioned event, they have never won a conference tournament in the Big12, Manhattan is a nowhere town in a nothing state, they rank outside the top 150 schools according to USNWR and outside the top 500 according to ARWU, the so called ‘power towel’sucks, and they can’t even afford an entire mascot costume; just the head.
KSU should feel lucky to be associated at all with CU. I feel no need to have a “rivalry” with them in the same way the Nuggets don’t feel a need to have a rivalry with Manhattan (KS) High School basketball. Congrats to them (I guess) on winning a football conference championship on the back of Darren Sproles and a gimmick offense.
I agree with you but shouldn’t they have done better than 2-6 if they wanted a 4 seed or higher. The men’s team lose the pac 12 title game but they improved as the season went on. Not surprised the selection committee put us as a 5.NET = Never Ever True
17 teams with worse NET rankings got higher seeds. This is a complete joke. Embarrassing really. Why even have the metric if it has zero bearing on seeding? South Carolina with a 6? WTAF?
NET Seed Colorado 25 10 Boise St 26 10 TX Tech 27 6 Florida 29 7 Miss St 31` 8 Nebraska 33 8 Nevada 34 10 Clemson 35 6 Colo St 36 10 Utah St 38 8 FAU 39 8 TCU 42 9 WSU 44 7 TX A&M 45 9 Drake 47 10 S Carolina 51 6 Northwestern 53 9 Virg 54 10
Wtf are you trying to say?I agree with you but shouldn’t they have done better than 2-6 if they wanted a 4 seed or higher. The men’s team lose the pac 12 title game but they improved as the season went on. Not surprised the selection committee put us as a 5.
An at large is technically any team who doesn't win it's conference tournament.They are higher than a 10, like I said. I suppose in previous years the at-large bids were 11 and higher, so that line varies year to year.
WTF! I know what an at-large bid is. Are you having reading comprehension troubles. There was a question that was asked about how you can be the "last 4 in" and still be a 10 seed. I answered that at-large bids were 10's and higher, with 11's and lower going to AQ's. Previous years the At-large bids were 11 and higher, with AQ's being 12 and lower. Maybe I should clarify that the highest seed is a 1, the lowest seed is a 16. The NCAA has a policy that AQ's will not play in the "First Four" with the exception of the 4 lowest seeded 16 seeds. Every other AQ is exempt from the "First Four" games. Which is why you can be an AQ and be a 12 seed but a 10 seed was part of the "last four in" and thus has to play in the "First Four" game.An at large is technically any team who doesn't win it's conference tournament.
Plus we were the first state to legalize pot! Lots of indoor farming.If K-State fans are truly talking **** by saying you don't know how to farm, be sure to tell them that we learned a lot about farming from our time in the PAC-12, as California is the #1 state in the country for agricultural production. I'm sure they'll appreciate that lol.
This is a great example of just because you do something a lot it doesn't mean that you are good at it or know anything about itThey're better at it than like half the Pac 12 fanbases.
Okay grandpa.This is a great example of just because you do something a lot it doesn't mean that you are good at it or know anything about it
I can understand the difficulty of schedule matters, but so does wins over selected teams. CU beat WSU 2 of 3 times, including tournament. And they get a #7 seed? Remember when CU was skipped over after beating KSU 3 times in a row and KSU was a #5 seed at large? Let's be honest. this is not a mathematical decision, and maybe should be. 36 at-large bids are not the problem the problem is the automatic bigs. . some one gets hot in a tournament and goes to the big dance with a losing record?? That's one spot an at-large team should have. Every NCAA tourney has a huge rack of sports articles about who "should" of been picked and who shouldn't. Get a clue NCAA. No more automatic bids.NET = Never Ever True
17 teams with worse NET rankings got higher seeds. This is a complete joke. Embarrassing really. Why even have the metric if it has zero bearing on seeding? South Carolina with a 6? WTAF?
NET Seed Colorado 25 10 Boise St 26 10 TX Tech 27 6 Florida 29 7 Miss St 31` 8 Nebraska 33 8 Nevada 34 10 Clemson 35 6 Colo St 36 10 Utah St 38 8 FAU 39 8 TCU 42 9 WSU 44 7 TX A&M 45 9 Drake 47 10 S Carolina 51 6 Northwestern 53 9 Virg 54 10