CSU Husker
Well-Known Member
2009 Missouri was #18 in coaches poll
Arizona was #20 when we beat them 33-0 in the Holiday bowl. How did Dan do in his bowl game last year?
The only bowl Danny has is the one the barber uses when he cuts his hair.
2009 Missouri was #18 in coaches poll
Arizona was #20 when we beat them 33-0 in the Holiday bowl. How did Dan do in his bowl game last year?
Sweet. Sounds like you can look forward to many seasons in the middle of the Big ? pack.
Seems like an interesting idea...
Ill 7-2-1
Indiana 7-9-3
Iowa 26-12-2
Michigan 2-3-1
Mich St 5-0
Minn 20-29-2
NW 3-1
Ohio St 0-2
Penn St 6-7
Purdue 0-1
Wisc 3-2
That does include bowl games, not reg season as you asked (but Im not bored enough to sort that out)
79-70 overall
Sweet. Sounds like you can look forward to many seasons in the middle of the Big ? pack.
Take Iowa out of that and I see a loser! Minnesota owns the Huskers.
Doubtful, many of those games date back to 1900. Not much use in forecasting future results.
So why when debating CU vs. Nebraska do you always fall back on all-time records? Hypocrite, much?
Take Iowa out of that and I see a loser! Minnesota owns the Huskers.
Man you are so wrong. I don't really know how to help you. Google can be your friend.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/year/2005/week/15
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/week/6
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/week/10
http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/week/15
Oh. Ok. Now, let's talk about all-time CU vs. CSU. Since such things matter so much.
Only if you do the same.
So you're saying that I shouldn't trust your university AD site's information? Seriously. I don't really care enough about the Cornchickens to check multiple sources.
Curious... who do you guys think will emerge as your new rival in the Big ? My guess: Iowa.
Losses against ranked teams
2009. #2 Texas, #12 Okie State
2008. #5 Texas, #15 Missouri, #16 Kansas, #13 Oklahoma State.
Balls in your court.
Not ownage like 48-18-2
Losses against ranked teams
2009. #2 Texas, #12 Okie State
2008. #21 West Virginia, #5 Texas, #15 Missouri, #16 Kansas, #13 Oklahoma State.
Balls in your court.
The 1960's - early 1980's were a mere statistical aborration. Things have looked better after the Jimmy Carter administration.
The key point is that that record doesn't mean much over the next couple decades. We're done.
You can dwell on those stats on that 500 mile drive to Lincoln. Because other than you and the other Denver based Husker fans, no one else in your area code cares.
FIFY (We beat #21 West Virginia in 2008). I also think some more teams we played were ranked at the time we played them if you use different polls like the Cornchicken fans seem to be doing.
Minnesota used to be a national power back in the early to mid 20th century. They won like 6 national championships. Look it up. Or...
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=minnesota+football+wiki
Not sure the point to this. How far back are we going?
For instance, in 2006, you lost to #23 (AP) and #19 (Coaches) Nebraska, 37-14. Why did you leave this off your list? Not sure I can trust your list if I found one exclusion right off the bat.
Excuses, excuses. Colo is 3-0 against Minnesota.
Illini - 1-1
Indiana - 3-1
Iowa - 2-0
Mich - 1-3
MSU - 0-3
Minn. 3-0
Nwest. 1-1
tOSU. 1-3
Wiscy 4-1-1
PennSt 1-1
CU against Big 10 is 17-14-1. .547 record. Not terrible. Better than NU's.
Well I guess Colorado has historically the better football program than NU since you have played the Big Ten a whole 31 times and have a slight winning percentage against them.
We have played the Big Ten many many more times than you have and for a lot longer period. We were playing Minnesota back when CU's program was in diapers.
Here is our last few games against just Minnesota since 1963 (14 games right there compared to 31 all time Big Ten-CU matchups):
You can't beat NU in any historical category. Don't even try.
Date Site Result NU Rank/Opp Attendance
09/22/1990 Lincoln W 56-0 8/ 76,354
09/23/1989+ Minneapolis W 48-0 3/ 58,368
09/15/1984 Lincoln W 38-7 1/ 76,077
09/17/1983+ Minneapolis W 84-13 1/ 62,687
10/05/1974 Lincoln W 54-0 6/ 76,408
10/06/1973 Minneapolis W 48-7 2/ 58,091
09/30/1972 Lincoln W 49-0 7/ 76,217
09/18/1971 Lincoln W 35-7 1/ 68,187
10/03/1970 Minneapolis W 35-10 6/ 52,287
10/04/1969 Minneapolis W 42-14 52,136
09/28/1968 Minneapolis W 17-14 9/17 53,362
09/30/1967 Lincoln W 7-0 7/ 65,347
09/26/1964 Minneapolis W 26-21 49,769
09/28/1963 Minneapolis W 14-7 60,711
The point is that you aren't going to get away with bombing a CU board with all that chest thumping and get a free pass. So go ahead an type up NU's losses to ranked teams in 2008 and 2009. Let those memories come flooding back. Go ahead and add 2007 and 2006 if you'd like and we'll keep at it until you get depressed enough to quit. We're kinda used being depressed around here.
So when are you going to start listing NU's losses to ranked teams? What is a Hokie, anyway?
You can't beat NU in any historical category. Don't even try.