Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Takeaways from the Rocky Mountain Beatdown

FlaBuff said:
df2e8c58aa0b50fb29e941ec09053be4.jpg

really.
Click to expand...
That was so ****ing epic! That spinning tunnel!
 
[QUOTE="Rob the Buff, post: 2050870, member: 20792"
Arizona State: ASU has had CU's number. I think we win this game. NAU is no where as talented, fast or strong as CU and they put pressure on ASU. They play tough at home though. This is a toss up game. What? You say we upset Oregon and USC but may drop this one? I don't know just a feeling. This one is going to be tough.
.[/QUOTE]
We play the scum devils in Boulder.
 
MtnBuff said:
The Fawcett in question.
Farrah_Fawcett_iconic_pinup_1976.jpg


This poster was on young boys walls all over America in the era.
Click to expand...

Not me. I was a Bo Derek guy.

NSFW and I won't post it here, but I think some of you guys will remember Bo in the wet shirt on the beach.
 
Rob the Buff said:
This years CSU team is no worse than last years Hawaii team. The result of the game will show the growth of the team. This years team playing last year wins the USC, Utah, Arizona and UCLA games.

After watching some of the other PAC12 games I think we have real shots on all of our home games. I think we also have shots on a few of our road games:

Michigan looks for real. In their house we will need lights out play. If we actually win this game start making PAC12 championship plans.

Oregon: no defense. After watching a bit of this game I think we have our first legitimate upset potential here. Our defense will hold Oregon under 35. The question is can our o and the Chev/Lindgren come up with 35. I believe an upset is possible here.

Oregon state will be in for a CSU style beating. We will eithe need this one to get our heads straight after the previous 2 tough ones or we will be just checking the box.

USC: I like our chances here. What you say? Really? Yes, USC is not a tough team. Their egos are fragile, they get punched in the mouth and they fold. CU will punch them in the mouth. This stamps the return on the rise. CU is ranked after this game.

Arizona State: ASU has had CU's number. I think we win this game. NAU is no where as talented, fast or strong as CU and they put pressure on ASU. They play tough at home though. This is a toss up game. What? You say we upset Oregon and USC but may drop this one? I don't know just a feeling. This one is going to be tough.

Stanford: at their place. rough. To be the best you have to beat the best. I will predict this game after the Michigan game.

UCLA. we are due and Rosen's douchebag mustache means we win this one going away. The only question I have is will we be playing for our bowl game here.

Arizona has problems. If we do not have our bowl game locked up yet we will here.

Washington state. I will bet Leavitts defense this year slows down Leavhes o better than they slow our o down. Solid win

Utah. Finally, the universe returns to normalcy and Utah is put in its place. Leavitt shows Utah what d look like.

If you can believe it I am predicting 8 wins. 9 after the bowl.
Click to expand...


Heavy Kool aide. I am in.,
 
"We haven't made a statement yet," said Buffs safety Afolabi Laguda late Friday night. "We made plenty of mistakes. We want to set the bar high. We're chasing that Pac-12 championship, nothing less. We don't want to go to some random 6-6 bowl game, we want to get to a championship. To do that, we need to play championship-level football."

WOW. Ya gotta like that attitude. Back it up boys. Go Buffs
 
Unless we are recruiting Falo to be a LB, I can't see him coming here. If he wants to be a TE, he should go to a place that uses one, except in goal-line formation.
 
buffaholic said:
Just re-watched 1H with rewind and slow Mo.
Lynott was destroying his guy. It was like watching a high-lite reel except for one false start.

And.......we simply don't use a TE much, YET! .
Click to expand...
FIFY!
Why bother? Get the base "O" down pat, then, save the fun stuff for meatchicken and after !
 
buffaholic said:
Just re-watched 1H with rewind and slow Mo.
Lynott was destroying his guy. It was like watching a high-lite reel except for one false start.

And.......we simply don't use a TE much.
Click to expand...

Had the same thoughts on TE. Just will not be used much in this offense.
 
Buffenuf said:
FIFY!
Why bother? Get the base "O" down pat, then, save the fun stuff for meatchicken and after !
Click to expand...
We haven't used a TE since Mac got here, I don't think we've been saving some special TE plays for 4 years to surprise Michigan. It's just not a valued piece of this offense.
 
Wasn't the leading receiver at SJSU a TE the last year for Mac/Lindgren?
 
The most pleasant surprises for me were Devin Ross and Bryce Bobo. We knew about the secondary, we know what we have in Sefo, Lindsey played the way I expected but the two WR's were maybe the biggest question marks coming into the game. With Spruce gone and Winfree out, somebody other than Fields was going to have to step up. Both Bobo and Ross answered with really good games. It's early but Ross seems to have figured out his issue with catching the ball. Bobo as well looked like the deep threat we needed opposite of Fields.
 
I thought Sefo did a better job going through his checks. At least thats my perception based on a couple of times I noticed him do that. Maybe not having Spruce makes him less dependent on one guy. Or something. Have any of you gone back and analyzed Sefo in that regard?
 
Buffnik said:
Wasn't the leading receiver at SJSU a TE the last year for Mac/Lindgren?
Click to expand...

Not sure if Otten led the team receiving-wise, but he definitely figured prominently into their passing attack. You may be thinking of TTU where Jace Amaro led the team in receptions in 2013.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top